Main 4NCL: 2015/2016 Entry Guidelines
-
- Posts: 2393
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:44 pm
Main 4NCL: 2015/2016 Entry Guidelines
These are now available here.
PS Can someone tell me how to be able to write "here" instead of showing the full link?!
PS Can someone tell me how to be able to write "here" instead of showing the full link?!
Last edited by Mike Truran on Thu Jul 16, 2015 5:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 3048
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 10:58 am
-
- Posts: 2393
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:44 pm
Re: Main 4NCL: 2015/2016 Entry Guidelines
I'm still none the wiser. I feel a bit like Soheil and his battles with the English language. What do I actually have to do?
-
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 9:42 pm
Re: Main 4NCL: 2015/2016 Entry Guidelines
If you hit the "quote" button on Martin's post, you will see the syntax in the reply box - alternatively if you delete the spaces before and after "=" below:Mike Truran wrote:I'm still none the wiser. I feel a bit like Soheil and his battles with the English language. What do I actually have to do?
[url = http://www.4ncl.co.uk/entry_guidelines.htm]here[/url]
you get
here
-
- Posts: 2393
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:44 pm
Re: Main 4NCL: 2015/2016 Entry Guidelines
Many thanks Martin and Matt! And thank you too Mick for your PM.
-
- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:05 pm
- Location: Evesham
-
- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:05 pm
- Location: Evesham
Re: Main 4NCL: 2015/2016 Entry Guidelines
Oooooh sought the advice and used it over thereCarl Hibbard wrote:All getting a bit techie in here?
Cheers
Carl Hibbard
Carl Hibbard
-
- Posts: 2393
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:44 pm
Re: Main 4NCL: 2015/2016 Entry Guidelines
Just practising! To be honest, I felt a bit sorry for them and thought the occasional post might cheer them up.
I'm pleased to see that there are no fewer than three users online at the moment, and that no fewer than 12 people have looked at my post since I posted over two hours ago (assuming that nobody was so shocked that someone had actually posted that they had to go back in to check).
It makes it all worthwhile.Is or more appropriate?
I'm pleased to see that there are no fewer than three users online at the moment, and that no fewer than 12 people have looked at my post since I posted over two hours ago (assuming that nobody was so shocked that someone had actually posted that they had to go back in to check).
It makes it all worthwhile.Is or more appropriate?
-
- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:05 pm
- Location: Evesham
Re: Main 4NCL: 2015/2016 Entry Guidelines
They are probably happy with 12 so congrats.Mike Truran wrote:Just practising! To be honest, I felt a bit sorry for them and thought the occasional post might cheer them up.
I'm pleased to see that there are no fewer than three users online at the moment, and that no fewer than 12 people have looked at my post since I posted over two hours ago (assuming that nobody was so shocked that someone had actually posted that they had to go back in to check).
It makes it all worthwhile.Is or more appropriate?
Cheers
Carl Hibbard
Carl Hibbard
-
- Posts: 2393
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:44 pm
Re: Main 4NCL: 2015/2016 Entry Guidelines
Fourteen now. And up to four online users.
-
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:31 pm
- Location: Awbridge, Hampshire
Re: Main 4NCL: 2015/2016 Entry Guidelines
The entry deadline has now passed and I see that one Division 1 team and one Division 2 team have not re-entered according to the entry list published today. Does this mean that one Division 1 team and two Division 2 teams are reprieved from relegation?
Re: Main 4NCL: 2015/2016 Entry Guidelines
Who knows? Something similar happened last year. In some contexts, it's called "fashionably late". But who knows
-
- Posts: 3338
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:27 pm
Re: Main 4NCL: 2015/2016 Entry Guidelines
Is there a precedent for a second (third) team entering but not a first team?David Robertson wrote:Who knows? Something similar happened last year. In some contexts, it's called "fashionably late". But who knows
-
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:31 pm
- Location: Awbridge, Hampshire
Re: Main 4NCL: 2015/2016 Entry Guidelines
It would be nice to know what's going on, as the latest entry list (9 Oct) no longer shows the 3rd team entry in Division 3.Richard Bates wrote:Is there a precedent for a second (third) team entering but not a first team?David Robertson wrote:Who knows? Something similar happened last year. In some contexts, it's called "fashionably late". But who knows
-
- Posts: 8466
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Main 4NCL: 2015/2016 Entry Guidelines
...and the fifth team has disappeared.Ian Thompson wrote: It would be nice to know what's going on, as the latest entry list (9 Oct) no longer shows the 3rd team entry in Division 3.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.