English Chess Forum

A home for discussions on the English Chess scene.
It is currently Tue Jul 22, 2014 12:21 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2012 3:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Posts: 10941
The latest blog http://stevegiddinschessblog.blogspot.c ... mania.html makes some interesting points about chess on TV, notably that occupying a wodge of TV time doesn't have to be a problem on a minority channel. He cites fishing as an example, but equally it applies to cricket.

Something that is a problem for long games is where a player goes into thought for an extended period. Even the most well briefed commentator will run out of things to say eventually. Game 5 of the Kasparov - Short match was a case in point.

So perhaps for televised games, you need to mess around with the move rate, not to make it faster in aggregate but to make sure something was always happening, or about to happen.

So start with an initial 10 minutes and award 2 and half minutes each move to 40. This sets the default time at 10 minutes and allocates 110 minutes to reach move 40. That's the same as FIDE's 40/90 with 30 second increments. At move 40, add an extra 10 minutes and reduce the increment to a minute and a half. So by move 60, you can use 110 + 10 + 20*1.5 = 150 minutes, again the same as the FIDE rate. Beyond move 60, the increment drops to 30 seconds, so the same as now.

The difference is that if you want a big think just out of the opening, you've only got around 30 minutes maximum assuming you've blitzed for the first dozen or so.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2012 4:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 2:02 pm
Posts: 1631
Must be a way to turn periods of extended thought into ad breaks.

_________________
To find a for(u)m that accommodates the mess, that is the task of the artist now. (Samuel Beckett)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2012 5:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 2:06 pm
Posts: 154
Location: Rome, Italy
Roger, if they really want to transmit live chess on TV, when players think too much the spectators can simply switch channel, and come back later. Time rates have already been decreased too much, once the standard rate was 2h 30 min x 40 moves + 1h every 16 moves, now the majority of european tournaments are played with the sleazy rate 90 + 30, it's a real shame. In this way players often reach endgames with very few time on the clock, and don't learn to play them correctly. Even your suggestion to give less time in the opening and more time later doesn't convince me very much, because it may well happen that after 10 moves you get a highly complex position that you haven't seen before, and that requires thinking. In this way you risk to favour those players who learn variations by heart, they could set opening pitfalls that their opponents would not be able to avoid because of the early time shortage.

In my opinion chess shouldn't be ruined in order to transmit it on TV ... luckily the most important tournaments are already full - covered on the web, so probably TV chess wouldn't have so much success.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2012 7:09 pm 
Mr Toad might be onto something. My Gran was a keen snooker fan despite never playing, but also watched the Tour de France every year. She had no interest in cycling, but liked to have the French scenery rolling by in the corner of a room.

If we are after the retired lady/ fishing demographic the solution is simple. Move chess outside, preferably somewhere picturesque. Next year, we should have Vlad and Lev playing on the back of a flat-bed truck, touring serenely through spectacular Swiss mountainscapes.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2012 8:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 3:16 pm
Posts: 338
The Master Game did it well; just play the game normally, then whisk the players into a room and record their thoughts. Hey presto, brilliant 30 minute chess program which also informs.

Such a pity it stopped.

_________________
A banker, a Daily Mail reader and a benefit claimant are sitting at a table sharing 12 biscuits. The banker takes 11 and says to the Daily Mail reader: “Watch out for the benefit claimant, he wants your biscuit”.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 8:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm
Posts: 1192
"Must be a way to turn periods of extended thought into ad breaks."

They tried that in Kasparov - Short, but every time they came back, there had been a flurry of activity.

You get the same effect by watching American coverage of golf. You get live footage of someone walking down the fairway, go to an ad break, and first scene when they come back is, "while you were away, this happened".

_________________
"You are unable to use it (forum) without rancour, unable to refrain from raising old grudges and continually bring it to the point where its owner has to remove posts which could be construed as defamatory of public figures." - P McKeown


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group