After 21. Bxg7 Bxg7 what happens?Simon Ansell wrote:Not sure there'll be a time scramble in this one, 19. dc6 Qc6 20. Nd5 looks horrible for Black.benedgell wrote:David Howell seems to have a knack of dragging his opponents into mutual time scrambles to get to the time control.
Edit: not played, maybe Black is ok again now. I suppose you had to see the trick 19. dc6 Qc6 20. Nd5 Nc7 (only move, I think) 21. Bg7! (f4 first might be stronger), but it's not an especially difficult line.
British 2015 Round by Round
-
- Posts: 1260
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 12:43 pm
- Location: Somerset
Re: British 2015 Round by Round
-
- Posts: 509
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 10:27 am
Re: British 2015 Round by Round
Re7benedgell wrote:After 21. Bxg7 Bxg7 what happens?Simon Ansell wrote:Not sure there'll be a time scramble in this one, 19. dc6 Qc6 20. Nd5 looks horrible for Black.benedgell wrote:David Howell seems to have a knack of dragging his opponents into mutual time scrambles to get to the time control.
Edit: not played, maybe Black is ok again now. I suppose you had to see the trick 19. dc6 Qc6 20. Nd5 Nc7 (only move, I think) 21. Bg7! (f4 first might be stronger), but it's not an especially difficult line.
-
- Posts: 1260
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 12:43 pm
- Location: Somerset
Re: British 2015 Round by Round
Missed that the knight's hanging. Whoops!
-
- Posts: 3053
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 10:58 am
Re: British 2015 Round by Round
The woodland animal further down is providing a fine example of how long the complications can sustain themselves in those positions. Online comp had Storey seemingly winning on move 40, but 40.. d5 was such a natural move. Back to hugely messy it seems.
-
- Posts: 1260
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 12:43 pm
- Location: Somerset
Re: British 2015 Round by Round
David's time handling has cost him here. Qxh7 was almost as bad as my terrible analysis in this thread.
-
- Posts: 509
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 10:27 am
Re: British 2015 Round by Round
He'd lost control by then anyway, at least I don't see a decent move. 23...g5 was nice from Nick.benedgell wrote:David's time handling has cost him here. Qxh7 was almost as bad as my terrible analysis in this thread.
-
- Posts: 10407
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Re: British 2015 Round by Round
Chessbomb giving 24 Qf5 as better for white
Any postings on here represent my personal views
-
- Posts: 509
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 10:27 am
Re: British 2015 Round by Round
What's the idea after 24. Qf5 Rg8?Mick Norris wrote:
Chessbomb giving 24 Qf5 as better for white
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: British 2015 Round by Round
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 10407
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Re: British 2015 Round by Round
It is only giving me 24 ...Nd4 sorrySimon Ansell wrote:What's the idea after 24. Qf5 Rg8?
Any postings on here represent my personal views
-
- Posts: 509
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 10:27 am
Re: British 2015 Round by Round
Must be 24 Qf5 Rg8 25. Rf3, but that's really unnatural and must be incredibly complicated, not surprised it wasn't played - 25... Nf4 is possible there for a startMick Norris wrote:It is only giving me 24 ...Nd4 sorrySimon Ansell wrote:What's the idea after 24. Qf5 Rg8?
-
- Posts: 1260
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 12:43 pm
- Location: Somerset
-
- Posts: 1260
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 12:43 pm
- Location: Somerset
Re: British 2015 Round by Round
Now 26. Nxf4 gxf4 27. Bxf4 looks good for white?
-
- Posts: 509
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 10:27 am
Re: British 2015 Round by Round
Might well be, but good luck calculating that with one minute on your clock. That's after you've already found the ridiculous-looking Qf5 + Rf3benedgell wrote:Now 26. Nxf4 gxf4 27. Bxf4 looks good for white?
-
- Posts: 3452
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 3:54 pm
Re: British 2015 Round by Round
Good call. Out of interest, at what point in the game did you say this. I was watching this game live and thought Flear could give Gormally a little tickle in the double rook ending but then was surprised by Rd7 instead of Rxc5. Did Glenn miss ... g5? Anyhoo, having stuffed up two winning double rook endings (actually managing to lose one two pawns up) last week, my judgement is not to be relied upon in these matters.benedgell wrote:Think Flear- Gormally is going to end drawn.
It’s too early to say it’s Gormally’s year just yet of course but he’s in a really good position. Already played Howell and Hawkins; ahead of his other nearest (elo rating) rivals; two whites to come ...
The Abysmal Depths of Chess: https://theabysmaldepthsofchess.blogspot.com