michele clack wrote:A lot of smaller congresses are running just 3 sections giving these big spreads, thats my point. I've heard people say they've changed their mind about going to particular congresses when they have found that they would be facing ths type of spread.
In my experience, Michele has a good point. More sections with smaller spreads = larger entries, and I have had experience of the improvement. However as has been pointed out by others, this means that prize money has to increase to cover more sections. [yes, You might end up playing the same core of players - but in practice that would happen anyway. You can always play up a section! That option becomes more attractive and less risky the more sections you have.]
If you are lucky enough to have a large venue, this is more than worth it. You can have modest prize funds and balance this with increased entries.
If you have a venue that is limited to X number of players, you have to cut your cloth to suit! Sometimes the number of sections is also limited by the availability of controllers and arbiters to cover the weekend.
When I look at the ECF Calendar I am impressed by the range of tournaments available; I would hate to standardise all events so that they had the same grading sections. It means that sometimes you are the favourite in a section - and sometimes the bunny! There is also the Berks & Bucks model - sections are only determined on the weekend, based on the entries divided into quartiles!