I think it's a polite way of saying "edited highlights" given the length and detail of Kasparov's annotations.Roger de Coverly wrote: The notes in the paper were acknowledged as being based on those in Kasparov's predecessors book. It's left as an exercise as to whether "based on" is a polite way of saying "copied from".
Can chess game notes ever really be copyrighted?
-
- Posts: 1266
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:23 pm