Best chance for chess success (imo)...
-
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 11:51 pm
- Location: West Bend,WI USA
Best chance for chess success (imo)...
is to fully learn and only play one opening
I float like a pawn island and sting like an ignored knight
Re: Best chance for chess success (imo)...
Unfortunately, it is difficult/impossible to do that as black!Steven DuCharme wrote:is to fully learn and only play one opening
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Best chance for chess success (imo)...
Clive Blackburn wrote:Unfortunately, it is difficult/impossible to do that as black!Steven DuCharme wrote:is to fully learn and only play one opening
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
Re: Best chance for chess success (imo)...
Yes, that comes under the "difficult" category rather than "impossible"JustinHorton wrote:Clive Blackburn wrote:Unfortunately, it is difficult/impossible to do that as black!Steven DuCharme wrote:is to fully learn and only play one opening
-
- Posts: 21338
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: Best chance for chess success (imo)...
After the opening comes the middle game (usually) and being as strong as possible in the middle game is necessary for chess success. But is it better to know something about almost everything or everything about a limited number of positions? If your general chess sense is good enough to be able to spot the "normal" move or moves in almost every early position, the need to "know" what to do is lessened outside of those positions where a long sequence of tactics is about to be set off.Steven DuCharme wrote:is to fully learn and only play one opening
Whilst it's possible to play .. g6, .. Bg7, .. d6, .. a6 against almost everything, the parallel attempt with White does nothing to seize the initiative and dictate the course of the game. There's also every danger that Black will get the tempo back and you end up playing Black in every game.
-
- Posts: 3254
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: Best chance for chess success (imo)...
I think you'd be a sitting duck if you did that.Steven DuCharme wrote:is to fully learn and only play one opening
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:35 pm
- Location: All Of Them
Re: Best chance for chess success (imo)...
It can work for some - I believe Mark Hebden has a fairly limited repertoire for a GM but knows the openings he does play really well so even opponents with prior knowledge cannot easily prep for a win.
Lose one queen and it is a disaster, Lose 1000 queens and it is just a statistic.
-
- Posts: 8478
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Best chance for chess success (imo)...
I think Mark has said himself that he might have achieved greater heights as a chess player if he had gained experience in a wider range of mainstream openings. Winning the Grand Prix does not require quite the same skills as taking on the world's best.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:35 pm
- Location: All Of Them
Re: Best chance for chess success (imo)...
I would rather have good knowledge in a small number of openings then mediocre in a lot of them.
Lose one queen and it is a disaster, Lose 1000 queens and it is just a statistic.
-
- Posts: 3340
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:27 pm
Re: Best chance for chess success (imo)...
Better to only play one opening but largely wing it.MJMcCready wrote:I think you'd be a sitting duck if you did that.Steven DuCharme wrote:is to fully learn and only play one opening
-
- Posts: 2720
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 4:16 pm
- Location: NW4 4UY
Re: Best chance for chess success (imo)...
Colin McNab
Duncan Suttles
David Norwood
Duncan Suttles
David Norwood
Adam Raoof IA, IO
Chess England Events - https://chessengland.com/
The Chess Circuit - https://chesscircuit.substack.com/
Don’t stop playing chess!
Chess England Events - https://chessengland.com/
The Chess Circuit - https://chesscircuit.substack.com/
Don’t stop playing chess!
-
- Posts: 1736
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 12:15 pm
Re: Best chance for chess success (imo)...
It used to be much easier to have a narrow repertoire in years gone by. Nowadays your opponent regularly comes to the board armed with database theory against any line you play with regularity.
After a recent league game, a certain forum regular told me that after seeing me play the Sicilian Wing Gambit had had studied a particular line with an engine for an hour before the game!
After a recent league game, a certain forum regular told me that after seeing me play the Sicilian Wing Gambit had had studied a particular line with an engine for an hour before the game!
-
- Posts: 2393
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:44 pm
Re: Best chance for chess success (imo)...
That would be me then. Outed at last.
For what it's worth, it was not going to be the pusillanimous and limp-wristed line that Number Two Son adopted against you a few months back.
For what it's worth, it was not going to be the pusillanimous and limp-wristed line that Number Two Son adopted against you a few months back.
Last edited by Mike Truran on Tue Mar 22, 2016 8:17 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 8478
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Best chance for chess success (imo)...
I cannot recall a time when a player known to rely on the Wing Gambit would not have found diligent opponents preparing for him. If you don't like that, play 2.Nf3 like other people and see if he can refute that with an hour on an engine.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
- Posts: 1736
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 12:15 pm
Re: Best chance for chess success (imo)...
Seen played on one occasion is not quite the same as 'known to rely on'. However, the fact that that game was played against Mikes' son ws the reason I played 2.Na3 - a much superior square for a knight than the much overated f3.NickFaulks wrote:I cannot recall a time when a player known to rely on the Wing Gambit would not have found diligent opponents preparing for him. If you don't like that, play 2.Nf3 like other people and see if he can refute that with an hour on an engine.
As it happens the wing gambit cannot be refuted with an hour on an engine.
I played the Caro-Kann exclusively for a couple of seasons, and it took me an embarrassingly long time to realise why I was facing long, obscure, theoretical lines against it in the 4ncl etc. Unless you are a booked up opening rain-man, in the modern game you need to remain a moving target.