Winning with 32 pieces on the board.

Discuss anything you like about chess related matters in this forum.
Roger de Coverly
Posts: 21320
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm

Winning with 32 pieces on the board.

Post by Roger de Coverly » Mon Nov 28, 2016 11:50 pm

Here's a recent rapid play game by Nigel Short as White in which his opponent resigns with all the pieces still on the board. (The Queen is trapped). The opening is vaguely reminiscent of ideas used by Mike Basman with the extended fianchetto created by playing g4, h3 and e3.

https://www.chessbomb.com/arena/2016-be ... rulich-cup



The position at move 20 is a candidate for the occasional series of "worst move on the board".


User avatar
IM Jack Rudd
Posts: 4828
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:13 am
Location: Bideford

Re: Winning with 32 pieces on the board.

Post by IM Jack Rudd » Tue Nov 29, 2016 12:10 am

Close, but no cigar. I think 20...Qg3 probably just about edges it.

Roger de Coverly
Posts: 21320
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm

Re: Winning with 32 pieces on the board.

Post by Roger de Coverly » Tue Nov 29, 2016 12:39 am

IM Jack Rudd wrote: I think 20...Qg3 probably just about edges it.
The worst plausible move then. Putting Queens en prise is generally noticeable. Allowing them to be trapped, particularly by responding to a "nothing move" like Bf1 then less so.

User avatar
Matt Mackenzie
Posts: 5247
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
Location: Millom, Cumbria

Re: Winning with 32 pieces on the board.

Post by Matt Mackenzie » Tue Nov 29, 2016 12:38 pm

Yes, "worst plausible move on the board" is a more accurate title for this genre - though admittedly not as snappy :)
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)