Even Worse Than Sofia Rules
-
- Posts: 3559
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:31 pm
- Location: Awbridge, Hampshire
Even Worse Than Sofia Rules
A Spanish tournament has this in their rules (in their translation to English):
"PONTEVEDRA RULE: out of respect for the audience and the persons who sponsoring the tournament, players who were taking up the first ten tables, they must play at least 20 moves and their games could not finish in less an hour."
I'm sure the spectators will be delighted to see two players sitting at the board not moving for an hour, or, more likely, to be watching two empty chairs until the players briefly return to sign the scoresheets.
"PONTEVEDRA RULE: out of respect for the audience and the persons who sponsoring the tournament, players who were taking up the first ten tables, they must play at least 20 moves and their games could not finish in less an hour."
I'm sure the spectators will be delighted to see two players sitting at the board not moving for an hour, or, more likely, to be watching two empty chairs until the players briefly return to sign the scoresheets.
-
- Posts: 3340
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:27 pm
Re: Even Worse Than Sofia Rules
I am surprised that a tournament that doesn't apply consistent rules across all boards is actually eligible for ratings, norms etc.
-
- Posts: 8472
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Even Worse Than Sofia Rules
Games are rated individually, so no problem. As to norms, that is worthy of discussion.Richard Bates wrote:I am surprised that a tournament that doesn't apply consistent rules across all boards is actually eligible for ratings, norms etc.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2016 1:10 pm
Re: Even Worse Than Sofia Rules
To my mind there are only two options.
-Insist that all draw offers are made through the arbiter, or
-Permit any and all draws.
Doing anything in between these two options leads to all kinds of theatrics that benefit nobody, least of all the spectators, who were presumably not after a masterclass in how to vacuum off all the pieces in an Exchange Slav or execute the Nf3-g5-f3, Re8-f8-e8 repetition of the Ruy Lopez. Obviously, in the absence of meaningful rules stopping it, two reasonably experienced players who want to draw will unfailingly produce that result, however many moves or minutes you tell them to do it in, and that's even assuming you can rule out repetitions. As such, I agree that the charades caused by this rule in particular will be more laughable than any that have gone before...
Minor caveats to the above.
For the first option to be meaningful the arbiter, who should be a player of reasonable strength, should have the right to declare that a draw has not been fought at all and demand a replay.
For the second option to not cause the game to be brought into disrepute, the 10-move stalemate and reconstructions of Hamppe-Meitner, Vienna 1872, should, inter alia, be banned.
-Insist that all draw offers are made through the arbiter, or
-Permit any and all draws.
Doing anything in between these two options leads to all kinds of theatrics that benefit nobody, least of all the spectators, who were presumably not after a masterclass in how to vacuum off all the pieces in an Exchange Slav or execute the Nf3-g5-f3, Re8-f8-e8 repetition of the Ruy Lopez. Obviously, in the absence of meaningful rules stopping it, two reasonably experienced players who want to draw will unfailingly produce that result, however many moves or minutes you tell them to do it in, and that's even assuming you can rule out repetitions. As such, I agree that the charades caused by this rule in particular will be more laughable than any that have gone before...
Minor caveats to the above.
For the first option to be meaningful the arbiter, who should be a player of reasonable strength, should have the right to declare that a draw has not been fought at all and demand a replay.
For the second option to not cause the game to be brought into disrepute, the 10-move stalemate and reconstructions of Hamppe-Meitner, Vienna 1872, should, inter alia, be banned.
Re: Even Worse Than Sofia Rules
There is absolutely only one rule worth considering. I speak as someone who has organised a few major international events, with an eye on their impact for sponsors.
Rule: let every game procedure without artificial intervention. Have no 'draw rules' - Sofia or otherwise. And definitely, no Arbiters sticking their nose in.
Principle: trust the players. It's their livelihood at stake. If they want to kill off sponsored events with dull or short draws, that's their problem. I don't think they're that stupid
Rule: let every game procedure without artificial intervention. Have no 'draw rules' - Sofia or otherwise. And definitely, no Arbiters sticking their nose in.
Principle: trust the players. It's their livelihood at stake. If they want to kill off sponsored events with dull or short draws, that's their problem. I don't think they're that stupid
-
- Posts: 5249
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
- Location: Millom, Cumbria
Re: Even Worse Than Sofia Rules
On this at least, I agree with David. Down with pointless gimmicks!
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)
-
- Posts: 4828
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:13 am
- Location: Bideford
Re: Even Worse Than Sofia Rules
I look forward to seeing what happens when a player on those boards is checkmated by move 19.Ian Thompson wrote:"PONTEVEDRA RULE: out of respect for the audience and the persons who sponsoring the tournament, players who were taking up the first ten tables, they must play at least 20 moves and their games could not finish in less an hour."
-
- Posts: 21322
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: Even Worse Than Sofia Rules
Or for that matter if they miss something serious in the opening.IM Jack Rudd wrote: I look forward to seeing what happens when a player on those boards is checkmated by move 19.
I've had this game twice.
It's the colours reversed version of why the Cambridge Springs can or perhaps did work surprisingly well in school's chess.
-
- Posts: 4828
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:13 am
- Location: Bideford
Re: Even Worse Than Sofia Rules
I've also had a quick win in the Caro-Kann:
-
- Posts: 21322
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: Even Worse Than Sofia Rules
Everyone else on record of reaching that position has spotted the problem and played .. a6, .. h6 or .. Be7.IM Jack Rudd wrote:I've also had a quick win in the Caro-Kann:
Chernev's old book was "Logical Chess, Move by Move". It could equally have been "Tactical Chess, Move by Move".
A method of studying openings, possibly superficial but safe, is to study the miniatures and how to avoid them.