I sort of agree but I don't think negativity is the right word. And I don't want to get bogged down in semantics which this post might provoke (oh dear). Constructive criticism is essential. If you're too open minded then your brain falls out.Nigel Wright wrote:I find any negativity necesary and in most cases absolutely essential, when doing anything, as it then allows for better planning [... ] I like the whole idea in general, but I'm a bit shocked at how little notice was given to the general chess-playing public about this scheme, and the fact that we weren't able to debate the idea and iron out any potential flaws before it went ahead. There are some major issues mentioned above, for example, man-power, and the huge scale of the scheme, that probably should have been openly debated about. Good luck anyway...
ISTM we have a great opportunity here to spread and share our game amongst young people. I think you are absolutely right that there are major issues. This has been landed on us. This is far from ideal but it's up to us as a chess community whether we complain about that, stand on the sidelines watching others struggle, or participate and try to make this enormous opportunity work.
I suppose my concern is that the task may be so large as to be unmanageable - even with the best will in the world but It looks like Charles has a proven track record in getting lots of young people to play chess. How many of us can say that?
We certainly need constructive criticism but we also need participation.
Having said all that I'm still trying to take on board everything in Charles's reply to my post - it was a bit like that after the meeting we had.
I feel inspired but I'm not sure what to do next!