PeterFarr wrote: I guess people are more likely to go along with a claim along the lines of "chess is a useful educational tool for these types of pupil (x), in these circumstances (y) because it helps in this way (z)." than with a more blanket assertion.
Maybe. Certainly that's the kind of thing we (by which I mean, those of us who are interested in the area) we need to aspire to. I wouldn't be surprised if it came out something like,
the inherent benefits of teaching chess to children are (a), (b) and (c), it seems particularly valuable for (x) in circumstance (y) and/or for (x1) in circumstance (y1).
The EEF research programme is certainly a very interesting and important initiative. That said, whatever the outcome turns out to be I would hope that it isn't used to reinforce the idea that the *only* goal for teaching chess in schools (or for anything that happens in schools) is enhancing formal academic attainment.