Who’s in charge?

Debate directly related to English Chess Federation matters.
Alan Kennedy
Posts: 194
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 6:33 am

Re: Who’s in charge?

Post by Alan Kennedy » Sat Oct 24, 2015 10:07 pm

Very wise words Michael (F). Mike T - I can only repeat the quote

"Latin is a language as dead as dead can be
It killed the ancient Romans and now its killing me"

I did put the phrases into Google Translate but will not comment on the outcome as I do not want to encourage Latin as a language (or indeed Messrs T and R). You both may wish to join the "progressives" nexus and use English :D

Mike Truran
Posts: 2393
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:44 pm

Re: Who’s in charge?

Post by Mike Truran » Sat Oct 24, 2015 10:59 pm

Alan

You shouldn't be such a Philistine. No doubt you will appreciate the Biblical reference.

Mike

PS "its " should have an apostrophe in it.

Alan Kennedy
Posts: 194
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 6:33 am

Re: Who’s in charge?

Post by Alan Kennedy » Sun Oct 25, 2015 12:05 am

Mike - I enjoy being a philistine! Far be from me to correct you but Its did not have an apostrophe as there wasn't one in my Latin text book and I was quoting! Bibical reference appreciated :D

Martin Regan

Re: Who’s in charge?

Post by Martin Regan » Sun Oct 25, 2015 12:29 am

Sorry for letting my own amusement derail the thread. Back to the point. I suspect the arbiter nexus (for want of a better phrase) might have proposed a new CEO and I'm certain the anti-arbiter nexus have proposed their own ideas for various posts.

NickFaulks
Posts: 8472
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm

Re: Who’s in charge?

Post by NickFaulks » Sun Oct 25, 2015 12:44 am

Martin Regan wrote: I'm certain the anti-arbiter nexus have proposed their own ideas for various posts.
Haven't they noticed that they lost 247-49?
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.