Who’s in charge?

Debate directly related to English Chess Federation matters.
Jonathan Rogers
Posts: 4662
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:26 pm

Re: Who’s in charge?

Post by Jonathan Rogers » Sat Oct 24, 2015 7:30 pm

Jonathan Bryant wrote:
Mike Truran wrote::shock:

Belgium managed without an elected government for 589 days. I expect the ECF can stagger on for a little while without a CEO.
Oh I’m quite sure they’ll manage. I was just idly wondering where to whom I’d send a letter if I happened to be of a mind to write to the ECF collectively. As opposed to a matter that was clearly with the remit of a particularly director.
As in Henry Kissinger's "who [sic] do I call if I want to call Europe?"

User avatar
Carl Hibbard
Posts: 6028
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:05 pm
Location: Evesham

Re: Who’s in charge?

Post by Carl Hibbard » Sat Oct 24, 2015 7:31 pm

Martin Regan wrote:
Tempora mutantur, nos et mutamur in illis. :shock:
auribus teneo lupum
As a pleb no idea :roll:
Cheers
Carl Hibbard

Jonathan Rogers
Posts: 4662
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:26 pm

Re: Who’s in charge?

Post by Jonathan Rogers » Sat Oct 24, 2015 7:32 pm

Carl Hibbard wrote:
John Upham wrote:
Jonathan Bryant wrote: What I had in mind was who’s in charge day to day.
Arbiters
There is always one :roll:
... and no surprise that he should be from the same 4NCL team as John Foley and Chris Fegan!

Mike Truran
Posts: 2393
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:44 pm

Re: Who’s in charge?

Post by Mike Truran » Sat Oct 24, 2015 7:53 pm

auribus teneo lupum
Quis est lupus? Cuius de auribus loquimur?

Just thought I'd ask.

John Philpott

Re: Who’s in charge?

Post by John Philpott » Sat Oct 24, 2015 8:03 pm

Michael Farthing wrote
Well to be neutral about it all you could write to Gary Wilson
Although you might do better writing to Gary Willson.

Anybody uncertain of who to contact is welcome to write care of the Company Secretary.

User avatar
Carl Hibbard
Posts: 6028
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:05 pm
Location: Evesham

Re: Who’s in charge?

Post by Carl Hibbard » Sat Oct 24, 2015 8:03 pm

For those of us who drink lager and not a small glass of red the rugby was won by New Zealand and Arsenal won as well.
Cheers
Carl Hibbard

User avatar
Michael Farthing
Posts: 2069
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 1:28 pm
Location: Morecambe, Europe

Re: Who’s in charge?

Post by Michael Farthing » Sat Oct 24, 2015 8:09 pm

John Philpott wrote:Michael Farthing wrote
Well to be neutral about it all you could write to Gary Wilson
Although you might do better writing to Gary Willson.

Anybody uncertain of who to contact is welcome to write care of the Company Secretary.
Whoops! I had a sneaking suspicion that the spelling was a little unusual - I blame it on the prosecco (my mistake, that is, not the spelling). Sorry!.

Martin Regan

Re: Who’s in charge?

Post by Martin Regan » Sat Oct 24, 2015 8:17 pm

Quis est lupus? Cuius de auribus loquimur?
our champion poster

Martin Regan

Re: Who’s in charge?

Post by Martin Regan » Sat Oct 24, 2015 8:21 pm

CH:
For those of us who drink lager and not a small glass of red the rugby was won by New Zealand and Arsenal won as well
For those of us who drink real beer and not the fizzy rubbish you call lager, the Manchester derby is tomorrow.

Mike Truran
Posts: 2393
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:44 pm

Re: Who’s in charge?

Post by Mike Truran » Sat Oct 24, 2015 8:45 pm

"Afraid of the dark, Lagerboy?"

"What's the matter Lagerboy, afraid you might taste something?"
With thanks to Witney's very own Wychwood brewery.

Jonathan Bryant
Posts: 3452
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 3:54 pm

Re: Who’s in charge?

Post by Jonathan Bryant » Sat Oct 24, 2015 8:55 pm

Jonathan Rogers wrote:
Jonathan Bryant wrote:
Mike Truran wrote::shock:

Belgium managed without an elected government for 589 days. I expect the ECF can stagger on for a little while without a CEO.
Oh I’m quite sure they’ll manage. I was just idly wondering where to whom I’d send a letter if I happened to be of a mind to write to the ECF collectively. As opposed to a matter that was clearly with the remit of a particularly director.
As in Henry Kissinger's "who [sic] do I call if I want to call Europe?"
I’m sure I put a "/" between 'where' and 'to'.

Brian Towers
Posts: 1266
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:23 pm

Re: Who’s in charge?

Post by Brian Towers » Sat Oct 24, 2015 9:27 pm

John Upham wrote:Arbiters, or, to be more exact, a select group of arbiters (forgetting the collective noun).
"Nexus", is the word you're looking for, I believe.
I just hope it's not the Alzheimer's starting to kick in ;-).
Ah, but I was so much older then. I'm younger than that now.

Alan Kennedy
Posts: 194
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 6:33 am

Re: Who’s in charge?

Post by Alan Kennedy » Sat Oct 24, 2015 9:33 pm

Dear Mike and Martin

The mere mortals who play chess have been ground down by weeks of argument and counter argument about the arbiter nexus etc. Now you are quoting Latin. Please bear with us while we catch up! I did have the privilege of studying a small amount of Latin. Written in the the text books was a quote

"Latin is a language as dead as dead can be
It killed the ancient Romans and now its killing me"

Your comments please gentlemen.

Alan

ps the last time I notice Mike agreed with Roger (in the other place) it was just before the other place crashed completely. Hope it is not an omen Carl!

Mike Truran
Posts: 2393
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:44 pm

Re: Who’s in charge?

Post by Mike Truran » Sat Oct 24, 2015 9:38 pm

Your comments please gentlemen.
Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit.

I rest my case.

User avatar
Michael Farthing
Posts: 2069
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 1:28 pm
Location: Morecambe, Europe

Re: Who’s in charge?

Post by Michael Farthing » Sat Oct 24, 2015 9:53 pm

It's an instinctive thing, Alan. Let it be!

Martin advised me (amongst others) that some of us, in our chat about Greek ancients and their parallels with modern equivalents 'did us no favours'. He was undoubtedly quite correct. Maybe he has fallen into the same trap. But hey! Let it be! Other people talk about the intricacies of the West Ham football team, which appears to have a sacred standing within the ECF, but leaves me cold. Let it be!

My words of wisdom (falling, you might notice, into the very same trap that is highlighted here).