A case of chess-blindness?
-
- Posts: 3191
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
A case of chess-blindness?
Hi all, does anyone know which move is being referred to here and what the consequences of Karpov's mistake were?
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1068238
The game referred to can be found below.http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1068238
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Posts: 2393
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:44 pm
Re: A case of chess-blindness?
The move referred to is 40. Nf1. Karpov should have played 40. Ne2. The consequence of Karpov's mistake was the loss of the game.
-
- Posts: 3191
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: A case of chess-blindness?
Ah okay I thought that was the move in question. So Karpov didn't actually move the knight incorrectly or anything like that, he just blundered? I wasn't sure what was meant by 'wrong square'.
-
- Posts: 1356
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 10:52 am
Re: A case of chess-blindness?
Interesting. I remember playing Tom Sweby, back in the 60's.
-
- Posts: 3191
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: A case of chess-blindness?
Aha, may I pm you about that?
-
- Posts: 21315
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: A case of chess-blindness?
The Knight (on g3) had just been hit by .. h4, so there was an apparent choice of the h1 or f1 squares. However on his previous move Korchnoi had responded to a hit on his queen by retreating it to d5, whereupon Karpov could have played Ne2, which though en prise to a passed pawn on d3 was also pinned to the undefended queen on d5.MJMcCready wrote:I wasn't sure what was meant by 'wrong square'.
So wrong square in the sense of forced move but blunder. You might use the same expression in a number of analytical circumstances.
-
- Posts: 1356
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 10:52 am
Re: A case of chess-blindness?
MJMcCready wrote:
Aha, may I pm you about that?
i would prefer it, if you put it on here. I have great difficulty finding the pm's. I am 84 and this modern technology soon gets the better of me.
Aha, may I pm you about that?
i would prefer it, if you put it on here. I have great difficulty finding the pm's. I am 84 and this modern technology soon gets the better of me.
-
- Posts: 3191
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: A case of chess-blindness?
Okay, well in my cheekiness which in truth was more of an attempt to stop the thread going off topic, I sent the pm without your permission, however, I was wondering if you could remember much of the aforementioned game, for example, when, where, and result. At present I am writing a post which incorporates much of Tom Sweby's writings, in fact when I returned home recently I spent about 20 hours with the microfilm on which his old chess column is kept but I have almost no info on his activities in the fifties. I have some info of his political movements within the SCCU and BCF but in terms of his games and play, I have nothing. Being located abroad, I do not have access to things like rating lists, so I don't yet have a rating for him and have to make do with estimations from past friends and opponents. I was hoping to locate one or two of his games but again this is proving to be very difficult indeed.Barry Sandercock wrote:MJMcCready wrote:
Aha, may I pm you about that?
i would prefer it, if you put it on here. I have great difficulty finding the pm's. I am 84 and this modern technology soon gets the better of me.
-
- Posts: 3191
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: A case of chess-blindness?
I had visions that Karpov had moved the knight diagonally or something but this was perhaps influenced by a tale in The Complete Chess Addict where Korchnoi once asked an arbiter if he could castle whilst his rook was under attack.Roger de Coverly wrote:The Knight (on g3) had just been hit by .. h4, so there was an apparent choice of the h1 or f1 squares. However on his previous move Korchnoi had responded to a hit on his queen by retreating it to d5, whereupon Karpov could have played Ne2, which though en prise to a passed pawn on d3 was also pinned to the undefended queen on d5.MJMcCready wrote:I wasn't sure what was meant by 'wrong square'.
So wrong square in the sense of forced move but blunder. You might use the same expression in a number of analytical circumstances.
-
- Posts: 490
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:57 pm
Re: A case of chess-blindness?
Known as Amaurosis Scacchistica. Frank Marshall was material down against Capablanca in the endgame, but missed a Queen skewer on the long diagonal.
-
- Posts: 2393
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:44 pm
Re: A case of chess-blindness?
A phrase that I believe is one of Dr Tarrasch's?
-
- Posts: 839
- Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 8:26 pm
Re: A case of chess-blindness?
Amaurosis seems to be a degenerative disease. Since chess blindness is usually only temporary, perhaps caecitas scacchistica is a more accurate description of the condition.
-
- Posts: 605
- Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 3:45 pm
Re: A case of chess-blindness?
Not for some of us!John Townsend wrote:chess blindness is usually only temporary
Re: A case of chess-blindness?
Out of interest, I wonder how unsighted chess players refer to the phenomenon of chess blindness? Do they have a different expression for it?
-
- Posts: 3191
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: A case of chess-blindness?
Good point.Clive Blackburn wrote:Out of interest, I wonder how unsighted chess players refer to the phenomenon of chess blindness? Do they have a different expression for it?