Why did he did so?

Technical questions regarding Openings, Middlegames, Endings etc.
soheil_hooshdaran
Posts: 3148
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: Why did he did so?

Post by soheil_hooshdaran » Sat Jun 10, 2017 10:47 am

Why would White win after Qa3+ in:

Roger de Coverly
Posts: 21321
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm

Re: Why did he did so?

Post by Roger de Coverly » Sat Jun 10, 2017 10:54 am

soheil_hooshdaran wrote:Why would White win after Qa3+ in:
There are only three legal moves, one of which, Qd6 puts the Queen en prise. Look at the other two, .. Kh7 allows Bxh7 check, winning the Queen by a discovery. On .. Qe7, as a minimum there's Qxe7, Kxe7 again followed by Bxh7 check although this time it's only a pawn. There might be a more convincing discovery.

LawrenceCooper
Posts: 7259
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:13 am

Re: Why did he did so?

Post by LawrenceCooper » Sat Jun 10, 2017 10:56 am

Roger de Coverly wrote:
soheil_hooshdaran wrote:Why would White win after Qa3+ in:
There are only three legal moves, one of which, Qd6 puts the Queen en prise. Look at the other two, .. Kh7 allows Bxh7 check, winning the Queen by a discovery. On .. Qe7, as a minimum there's Qxe7, Kxe7 again followed by Bxh7 check although this time it's only a pawn. There might be a more convincing discovery.
Bc6 isn't a bad response to Qe7 either :D

Leonard Barden
Posts: 1861
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 11:21 am

Re: Why did he did so?

Post by Leonard Barden » Sat Jun 10, 2017 10:59 am

Evans-Bisguier, US championship 1959.

soheil_hooshdaran
Posts: 3148
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: Why did he did so?

Post by soheil_hooshdaran » Sat Jun 10, 2017 11:30 am

/

soheil_hooshdaran
Posts: 3148
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: Why did he did so?

Post by soheil_hooshdaran » Sat Jun 10, 2017 11:38 am

Leonard Barden wrote:Evans-Bisguier, US championship 1959.
The first book I read was a translation of your Chess Theory. Happy to cross-post.

Leonard Barden
Posts: 1861
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 11:21 am

Re: Why did he did so?

Post by Leonard Barden » Sat Jun 10, 2017 12:21 pm

soheil_hooshdaran wrote:
Leonard Barden wrote:Evans-Bisguier, US championship 1959.
The first book I read was a translation of your Chess Theory. Happy to cross-post.
None of my books was entitled Chess Theory.

soheil_hooshdaran
Posts: 3148
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: Why did he did so?

Post by soheil_hooshdaran » Sat Jun 10, 2017 7:04 pm

Leonard Barden wrote:
soheil_hooshdaran wrote:
Leonard Barden wrote:Evans-Bisguier, US championship 1959.
The first book I read was a translation of your Chess Theory. Happy to cross-post.
None of my books was entitled Chess Theory.
It is still amongst the best sellers, selling for less than a pound over the internet.
The title of the translation reads تئوري شطرنج (literally The Theory of Chess). I remember it contained 10 opening traps, etc.

Michael Flatt
Posts: 1235
Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 7:36 am
Location: Hertfordshire

Re: Why did he did so?

Post by Michael Flatt » Sat Jun 10, 2017 7:58 pm

soheil_hooshdaran wrote:
Leonard Barden wrote:
soheil_hooshdaran wrote: The first book I read was a translation of your Chess Theory. Happy to cross-post.
None of my books was entitled Chess Theory.
It is still amongst the best sellers, selling for less than a pound over the internet.
The title of the translation reads تئوري شطرنج (literally The Theory of Chess). I remember it contained 10 opening traps, etc.
Are you really prepared to argue with an author over the title of his own book?
Unbelievable!

soheil_hooshdaran
Posts: 3148
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: Why did he did so?

Post by soheil_hooshdaran » Sat Jun 10, 2017 8:11 pm

Michael Flatt wrote:
soheil_hooshdaran wrote:
Leonard Barden wrote:
None of my books was entitled Chess Theory.
It is still amongst the best sellers, selling for less than a pound over the internet.
The title of the translation reads تئوري شطرنج (literally The Theory of Chess). I remember it contained 10 opening traps, etc.
Are you really prepared to argue with an author over the title of his own book?
Unbelievable!
No, I just said the title of the translation, and what the book's content was.

Leonard Barden
Posts: 1861
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 11:21 am

Re: Why did he did so?

Post by Leonard Barden » Sat Jun 10, 2017 9:03 pm

soheil_hooshdaran wrote:
Michael Flatt wrote:
soheil_hooshdaran wrote:
It is still amongst the best sellers, selling for less than a pound over the internet.
The title of the translation reads تئوري شطرنج (literally The Theory of Chess). I remember it contained 10 opening traps, etc.
Are you really prepared to argue with an author over the title of his own book?
Unbelievable!
No, I just said the title of the translation, and what the book's content was.
It sounds like Play Better Chess, which I wrote in the early 1980s. That was a large coffee table size volume which included an opening repertoire, general advice on improvement, mini-biographies of leading masters etc and was my best book. Korchnoi contributed a foreword. Unfortunately the publishers Octopus insisted on marketing it through WH Smith rather than normal chess outlets, with the result that most copies were remaindered. It is indeed still available cheaply on the internet from Amazon.

soheil_hooshdaran
Posts: 3148
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: Why did he did so?

Post by soheil_hooshdaran » Tue Jun 13, 2017 3:03 am

Leonard Barden wrote:
soheil_hooshdaran wrote:
Michael Flatt wrote: Are you really prepared to argue with an author over the title of his own book?
Unbelievable!
No, I just said the title of the translation, and what the book's content was.
It sounds like Play Better Chess, which I wrote in the early 1980s. That was a large coffee table size volume which included an opening repertoire, general advice on improvement, mini-biographies of leading masters etc and was my best book. Korchnoi contributed a foreword. Unfortunately the publishers Octopus insisted on marketing it through WH Smith rather than normal chess outlets, with the result that most copies were remaindered. It is indeed still available cheaply on the internet from Amazon.
Yes, it's a translation and abridgement of Play Chess Better.

soheil_hooshdaran
Posts: 3148
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: Why did he did so?

Post by soheil_hooshdaran » Tue Jun 13, 2017 3:06 am

Could someone please explain to me this comination? What does White gain?

soheil_hooshdaran
Posts: 3148
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: Why did he did so?

Post by soheil_hooshdaran » Tue Jun 13, 2017 8:31 am

And this:

Roger de Coverly
Posts: 21321
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm

Re: Why did he did so?

Post by Roger de Coverly » Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:25 am

In both cases, Black looks to be completely tied down. Try finding decent moves for Black in the resulting positions.