Why did he did so?
-
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm
Re: Why did he did so?
Why would White win after Qa3+ in:
-
- Posts: 21321
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: Why did he did so?
There are only three legal moves, one of which, Qd6 puts the Queen en prise. Look at the other two, .. Kh7 allows Bxh7 check, winning the Queen by a discovery. On .. Qe7, as a minimum there's Qxe7, Kxe7 again followed by Bxh7 check although this time it's only a pawn. There might be a more convincing discovery.soheil_hooshdaran wrote:Why would White win after Qa3+ in:
-
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:13 am
Re: Why did he did so?
Bc6 isn't a bad response to Qe7 eitherRoger de Coverly wrote:There are only three legal moves, one of which, Qd6 puts the Queen en prise. Look at the other two, .. Kh7 allows Bxh7 check, winning the Queen by a discovery. On .. Qe7, as a minimum there's Qxe7, Kxe7 again followed by Bxh7 check although this time it's only a pawn. There might be a more convincing discovery.soheil_hooshdaran wrote:Why would White win after Qa3+ in:
-
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 11:21 am
Re: Why did he did so?
Evans-Bisguier, US championship 1959.
-
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm
Re: Why did he did so?
The first book I read was a translation of your Chess Theory. Happy to cross-post.Leonard Barden wrote:Evans-Bisguier, US championship 1959.
-
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 11:21 am
Re: Why did he did so?
None of my books was entitled Chess Theory.soheil_hooshdaran wrote:The first book I read was a translation of your Chess Theory. Happy to cross-post.Leonard Barden wrote:Evans-Bisguier, US championship 1959.
-
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm
Re: Why did he did so?
It is still amongst the best sellers, selling for less than a pound over the internet.Leonard Barden wrote:None of my books was entitled Chess Theory.soheil_hooshdaran wrote:The first book I read was a translation of your Chess Theory. Happy to cross-post.Leonard Barden wrote:Evans-Bisguier, US championship 1959.
The title of the translation reads تئوري شطرنج (literally The Theory of Chess). I remember it contained 10 opening traps, etc.
-
- Posts: 1235
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 7:36 am
- Location: Hertfordshire
Re: Why did he did so?
Are you really prepared to argue with an author over the title of his own book?soheil_hooshdaran wrote:It is still amongst the best sellers, selling for less than a pound over the internet.Leonard Barden wrote:None of my books was entitled Chess Theory.soheil_hooshdaran wrote: The first book I read was a translation of your Chess Theory. Happy to cross-post.
The title of the translation reads تئوري شطرنج (literally The Theory of Chess). I remember it contained 10 opening traps, etc.
Unbelievable!
-
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm
Re: Why did he did so?
No, I just said the title of the translation, and what the book's content was.Michael Flatt wrote:Are you really prepared to argue with an author over the title of his own book?soheil_hooshdaran wrote:It is still amongst the best sellers, selling for less than a pound over the internet.Leonard Barden wrote:
None of my books was entitled Chess Theory.
The title of the translation reads تئوري شطرنج (literally The Theory of Chess). I remember it contained 10 opening traps, etc.
Unbelievable!
-
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 11:21 am
Re: Why did he did so?
It sounds like Play Better Chess, which I wrote in the early 1980s. That was a large coffee table size volume which included an opening repertoire, general advice on improvement, mini-biographies of leading masters etc and was my best book. Korchnoi contributed a foreword. Unfortunately the publishers Octopus insisted on marketing it through WH Smith rather than normal chess outlets, with the result that most copies were remaindered. It is indeed still available cheaply on the internet from Amazon.soheil_hooshdaran wrote:No, I just said the title of the translation, and what the book's content was.Michael Flatt wrote:Are you really prepared to argue with an author over the title of his own book?soheil_hooshdaran wrote:
It is still amongst the best sellers, selling for less than a pound over the internet.
The title of the translation reads تئوري شطرنج (literally The Theory of Chess). I remember it contained 10 opening traps, etc.
Unbelievable!
-
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm
Re: Why did he did so?
Yes, it's a translation and abridgement of Play Chess Better.Leonard Barden wrote:It sounds like Play Better Chess, which I wrote in the early 1980s. That was a large coffee table size volume which included an opening repertoire, general advice on improvement, mini-biographies of leading masters etc and was my best book. Korchnoi contributed a foreword. Unfortunately the publishers Octopus insisted on marketing it through WH Smith rather than normal chess outlets, with the result that most copies were remaindered. It is indeed still available cheaply on the internet from Amazon.soheil_hooshdaran wrote:No, I just said the title of the translation, and what the book's content was.Michael Flatt wrote: Are you really prepared to argue with an author over the title of his own book?
Unbelievable!
-
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm
Re: Why did he did so?
Could someone please explain to me this comination? What does White gain?
-
- Posts: 21321
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: Why did he did so?
In both cases, Black looks to be completely tied down. Try finding decent moves for Black in the resulting positions.