J Hawkins
Re: J Hawkins
Yes.William Metcalfe wrote:As a rapidly improving player would Johnnys name come up when concidering team selections for olympiad or european team champs.
-
- Posts: 585
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 3:12 pm
- Location: Darlington
Re: J Hawkins
Thanks Loz the reason i asked were 2 fold it would probably speed up his progress and secondly he could be a bit of a suprise weapon for overseas opposition
I am speaking here for myself and not the NCCU which i am now president of
-
- Posts: 8806
- Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
- Location: London
Re: J Hawkins
Consideration for selection, yes. Actual selection might be less obvious, unless lots of GMs and higher-rated players were unavailable. I presume that higher-rated players and GMs would be asked first. That said, I know very little about the selection process. I'd be more interested in the history of the teams - when was the last time anyone with a title lower than that of GM was selected for either event?
-
- Posts: 585
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 3:12 pm
- Location: Darlington
Re: J Hawkins
Sorry Chris i have to disagree lets say Luke is unavailable due to work commitments who do you think could do a better job on board 5.
We should be picking players that are on a roll that are improving at a rapid rate especially if there are no stand out candidates for board 5 if Luke is unavailable.
We should be picking players that are on a roll that are improving at a rapid rate especially if there are no stand out candidates for board 5 if Luke is unavailable.
I am speaking here for myself and not the NCCU which i am now president of
-
- Posts: 662
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 11:01 pm
- Location: North of England
Re: J Hawkins
If you're into ancient history, you could also ask the 'reciprocal' question: when was the last time an England team had no GMs in it. I have an old Batsford book of the 1974 Nice Olympiad, which suggests that might be the answer - the England team, in board order:Christopher Kreuzer wrote:I'd be more interested in the history of the teams - when was the last time anyone with a title lower than that of GM was selected for either event?
Hartston (beat Portisch, had better of game against Karpov but missed probable win)
Keene (scored 1st GM norm)
Penrose
Whiteley
Stean (scored 1st IM norm, won best game prize for much-anthologised sacrificial win against Walter Browne)
Markland
Only Penrose (IM 1961) and Keene (IM 1972, I guess before the Olympiad) were titled at all.
Needless to say, the USSR team won the Olympiad: in board order Karpov, Korchnoi, Spassky, Petrosian, Tal and Kuzmin. Not a bad team.
-
- Posts: 662
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 11:01 pm
- Location: North of England
PS
As a PS to that last one, and perhaps relevant to the discussion, I'd guess that several of the Miles/Stean/Mestel/Nunn/Speelman 1970s/80s GM generation played in international team events pretty young, and probably before they had their GM, or sometimes even their IM, titles.
-
- Posts: 1394
- Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 8:33 pm
- Location: Oldham
Re: J Hawkins
Is not the following still ahead of Jonathan, if you exclude Micky, Nigel, David H, and Gawain (all the below have been consistently above 2500)William Metcalfe wrote:Sorry Chris i have to disagree lets say Luke is unavailable due to work commitments who do you think could do a better job on board 5.
We should be picking players that are on a roll that are improving at a rapid rate especially if there are no stand out candidates for board 5 if Luke is unavailable.
Nick Pert
Stephen Gordon
Stewart Haslinger
Danny Gormally
Simon Williams
One thing maybe Jon has to do is play tournaments abroad as well, gaining foreign experience will certainly help his improvement and maybe selection
-
- Posts: 585
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 3:12 pm
- Location: Darlington
Re: J Hawkins
Which of those players would you put your own money on to beat the Hawk plus 3 or 4 players in that list have had a chance before did they do enough when they played for England to keep the place ?.
I thaught the ECFs charter was to encourage and promote chess what a great boost players not from the south east would get by seeing somebody from the regions representing England
I thaught the ECFs charter was to encourage and promote chess what a great boost players not from the south east would get by seeing somebody from the regions representing England
I am speaking here for myself and not the NCCU which i am now president of
-
- Posts: 757
- Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 12:03 pm
- Location: Behind you
Re: J Hawkins
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that Haslinger is from nowhere near the SE. I worked that out from approximately 20 seconds of research. It's amazing what you can find if you actually bother looking, instead of just making groundless, baseless assertions with no fact-checking whatsoever.William Metcalfe wrote:Which of those players would you put your own money on to beat the Hawk plus 3 or 4 players in that list have had a chance before did they do enough when they played for England to keep the place ?.
I thaught the ECFs charter was to encourage and promote chess what a great boost players not from the south east would get by seeing somebody from the regions representing England
True glory lies in doing what deserves to be written; in writing what deserves to be read.
-
- Posts: 585
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 3:12 pm
- Location: Darlington
Re: J Hawkins
I know where haslinger is from so do not insult my inteligence and guess what unlike you i did not have to do some sort of search.
Do you know where Johnny is from it really is in the middle of nowere its a 60 min journey from darlo head out into the countryside and keep driving lol.
He does not work or drive that is the reason he does not play abroud Alan its a matter of cost hopefully that will change in the future
Do you know where Johnny is from it really is in the middle of nowere its a 60 min journey from darlo head out into the countryside and keep driving lol.
He does not work or drive that is the reason he does not play abroud Alan its a matter of cost hopefully that will change in the future
I am speaking here for myself and not the NCCU which i am now president of
Re: J Hawkins
I'd be happy to see Hawkins in the England team on merit, his fast improvement means it would be reasonable to pick him ahead of some players with higher ratings.William Metcalfe wrote:I thaught the ECFs charter was to encourage and promote chess what a great boost players not from the south east would get by seeing somebody from the regions representing England
I don't accept that there is any existing discrimination on geography, or a need for positive discrimination. Players from Cornwall, Lancashire, Leicestershire come to mind.
-
- Posts: 21301
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: J Hawkins
William Metcalfe wrote:I thaught the ECFs charter was to encourage and promote chess what a great boost players not from the south east would get by seeing somebody from the regions representing England
As far as the International team is concerned, the remit should be to select the team most likely within the finance available to score the highest finishing position. Any notion of regional quotas has no place in this.
-
- Posts: 10329
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Re: J Hawkins
Interesting geographical spread? Markland is from Bolton I believeAustinElliott wrote:I have an old Batsford book of the 1974 Nice Olympiad, which suggests that might be the answer - the England team, in board order:
Hartston
Keene
Penrose
Whiteley
Stean
Markland
Of the current team, we have Short from Bolton, Adams from Cornwall, is Howell from Sussex and Gawain from Yorkshire? No north east players, but no regional bias either
Stephen Gordon is from Greater Manchester, Stewart Haslinger from Merseyside, Mark Hebden from Leics, I think Danny Gormally is Kent, but has been in the North East and also plays for Heywood in Greater Manchester
I think Hawkins may well be worth a go, but if we are not sending our top players to the European due to funding issues, then there are lots of potential players to choose from
Any postings on here represent my personal views
-
- Posts: 21301
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: J Hawkins
For no GMs, that has to be the answer. Miles had the title by then.AustinElliott wrote:If you're into ancient history, you could also ask the 'reciprocal' question: when was the last time an England team had no GMs in it. I have an old Batsford book of the 1974 Nice Olympiad, which suggests that might be the answer - the England team, in board order:
It wasn't until 1990 that the team was 100% GM despite having come second a number of times in the years before. In 1984 Short, in 1986 Flear and 1988 Watson were all nominally IMs at the time . Stats from http://www.olimpbase.org/
The 1990 team was
Short
Speelman
Nunn
Adams
Chandler
Hodgson
It shows where we used to rank in World chess. That team finished third (on tie break) behind the USSR and the USA. At least two members of that team (Adams and Hodgson) were regular players on the weekend Congress scene. To find out the latest theory in the Tromp, you just had to look at the top board games in the Open.