Dunno why Kamsky didn't go for it today. He's gone from a potential first outright going into the last round to joining what could be a large group of GMs on 7/9 and having to play against one of them with black in the last round. The organisers/ sponsors must be horribly disappointed.Phil Neatherway wrote:A stunning game between Kamsky and Ivanchuk today.
Gibraltar 2014
-
- Posts: 1260
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 12:43 pm
- Location: Somerset
Re: Gibraltar 2014
-
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:13 am
Re: Gibraltar 2014
Black resigned against me also last year in Teplice, Czech Republic. I had a good attack going but it was far from over and I doubt any other oppo would have resigned. He wore an Ipswich Town shirt (despite being Danish). I don't think this had anything to do with the premature resignation, but I could be wrong!IM Jack Rudd wrote:Today's puzzle: why did black resign in the final position?
-
- Posts: 4826
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:13 am
- Location: Bideford
Re: Gibraltar 2014
Peter has it.PeterFarr wrote:I'm guessing Black actually picked up the rook and d2 intending to take on c2, then noticed Qxd8 mate as Brendan said, and finally realized too late that any other move by that rook loses.
(It's not quite the worst half-move on the board - picking up the c2 rook would be even worse - but it's certainly the second worst.)
-
- Posts: 9085
- Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 5:18 pm
- Location: Oldbury, Worcestershire
Re: Gibraltar 2014
I assumed, mistakenly, that black resigned because white was genuinely winning, and that was the puzzle.IM Jack Rudd wrote:Peter has it.PeterFarr wrote:I'm guessing Black actually picked up the rook and d2 intending to take on c2, then noticed Qxd8 mate as Brendan said, and finally realized too late that any other move by that rook loses.
(It's not quite the worst half-move on the board - picking up the c2 rook would be even worse - but it's certainly the second worst.)
-
- Posts: 624
- Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2013 11:20 pm
- Location: Horsham, Sussex
Re: Gibraltar 2014
Well, You did the harder bit by showing that black wasn't lost without a trick...Alex Holowczak wrote:I assumed, mistakenly, that black resigned because white was genuinely winning, and that was the puzzle.IM Jack Rudd wrote:Peter has it.PeterFarr wrote:I'm guessing Black actually picked up the rook and d2 intending to take on c2, then noticed Qxd8 mate as Brendan said, and finally realized too late that any other move by that rook loses.
(It's not quite the worst half-move on the board - picking up the c2 rook would be even worse - but it's certainly the second worst.)
Incidentally, thanks to Simon Brown for pointing out Jack's very entertaining game today - and to Jack for playing it of course!
-
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 9:14 am
Re: Gibraltar 2014
I think Kamsky DID go for it. It was pretty obvious from his body language, and the amount of time he spent thinking, he could find nothing better than a repetition. He was, after all, material down. It happens sometimes...benedgell wrote:Dunno why Kamsky didn't go for it today. He's gone from a potential first outright going into the last round to joining what could be a large group of GMs on 7/9 and having to play against one of them with black in the last round. The organisers/ sponsors must be horribly disappointed.Phil Neatherway wrote:A stunning game between Kamsky and Ivanchuk today.
Re: Gibraltar 2014
And, sometimes does it not also happen that a group of top players come to an accommodation - even a tacit one - to share the spoils equitably?
-
- Posts: 624
- Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2013 11:20 pm
- Location: Horsham, Sussex
Re: Gibraltar 2014
During the game, Simon and Irina in the commentary certainly seemed to agree with this, suggesting that Kamsky may have been caught out.Nigel Short wrote:I think Kamsky DID go for it. It was pretty obvious from his body language, and the amount of time he spent thinking, he could find nothing better than a repetition. He was, after all, material down. It happens sometimes...benedgell wrote:Dunno why Kamsky didn't go for it today. He's gone from a potential first outright going into the last round to joining what could be a large group of GMs on 7/9 and having to play against one of them with black in the last round. The organisers/ sponsors must be horribly disappointed.Phil Neatherway wrote:A stunning game between Kamsky and Ivanchuk today.
-
- Posts: 4826
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:13 am
- Location: Bideford
Re: Gibraltar 2014
It does. But usually not when they have as strong a motivation as Kamsky did not to.John McKenna wrote:And, sometimes does it not also happen that a group of top players come to an accommodation - even a tacit one - to share the spoils equitably?
-
- Posts: 1356
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 10:52 am
Re: Gibraltar 2014
Michael Adams had an interesting draw this morning.
-
- Posts: 427
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 2:36 pm
- Location: Church Stretton
Re: Gibraltar 2014
An interesting game in progress in Vachier Lagrave- Ivanchuck on board one. The latter has just taken the second sacrificed piece.
And can someone explain what was going on in Adams game? It's way beyond my understanding, maybe we'll ask him to explain when he comes to Shrosphire for his simul next month!
And can someone explain what was going on in Adams game? It's way beyond my understanding, maybe we'll ask him to explain when he comes to Shrosphire for his simul next month!
Shropshire Chess Congress
http://www.shropshirechesscongress.org.uk
http://www.shropshirechesscongress.org.uk
-
- Posts: 21314
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: Gibraltar 2014
You could also try Vallejo Pons and Lenier Dominguez who played an identical game in 2006. At one level, it's a case of sharp tactical blows leading to a draw by repetition. At another level, perhaps both players were aware of the previous game, so knew how the tactics would work out. It's not always safe to assume your opponent is prepared to draw as there might be a devastating novelty available.Steve Rooney wrote: And can someone explain what was going on in Adams game? It's way beyond my understanding, maybe we'll ask him to explain when he comes to Shrosphire for his simul next month!
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Gibraltar 2014
Only just caught up with Kamsky-Ivanchuk. Curious that 1.d4 Nf6 2.Bf4 c5 should come up more than once after I mentioned it in passing a fortnight ago.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 9:14 am
Re: Gibraltar 2014
Ivanchuk must be studying your posts, Justin...JustinHorton wrote:Only just caught up with Kamsky-Ivanchuk. Curious that 1.d4 Nf6 2.Bf4 c5 should come up more than once after I mentioned it in passing a fortnight ago.
-
- Posts: 1024
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 4:45 pm
Re: Gibraltar 2014
Kamsky came into the commentary room after the game and said "nobody has played Qb6 against me in that position for more than 10 years and I forgot the theory" (or words to that effect). A certain amount of surprise was expressed about this (although not to Kamsky's face).