http://www.chessscotland.com/forum/view ... f=4&t=1091A week to go and not a single GM or IM from England? Anyone know why?
which might better be answered on this forum
http://www.chessscotland.com/forum/view ... f=4&t=1091A week to go and not a single GM or IM from England? Anyone know why?
You might want to have a word with Chess Scotland. It's all very well to restrict posters to Chess Scotland members or whatever, but a casual visitor isn't even allowed to read what is being said, let alone reply.andyburnett wrote:A question asked today on our CS forum...
Re: Commonwealth less than fortnight to go!!
Unread postby George Neave » Sun Jun 22, 2014 6:05 pm
A week to go and not a single GM or IM from England? Anyone know why?
George Neave
Emanuel Lasker
Posts: 98
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 9:41 pm
Top
Re: Commonwealth less than fortnight to go!!
Unread postby andyburnett » Sun Jun 22, 2014 6:48 pm
George Neave wrote:A week to go and not a single GM or IM from England? Anyone know why?
Could it be because 'they' complained so much about the Indian contingent winning at the British - (who were subsequently deemed ineligible from 2004) - that they have no desire to return to losing ways against our sub-continent brethren?
andyburnett
Boris Spassky
Posts: 489
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 8:02 am
Top
Re: Commonwealth less than fortnight to go!!
Unread postby Alan Jelfs » Sun Jun 22, 2014 6:58 pm
George Neave wrote:A week to go and not a single GM or IM from England? Anyone know why?
It is still term time in England so that would rule out the under-18s and teachers.
I get my kicks above the waistline, sunshine
Alan Jelfs
Alexander Alekhine
Posts: 158
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:23 pm
Top
Re: Commonwealth less than fortnight to go!!
Unread postby Alan Tate » Sun Jun 22, 2014 9:22 pm
My source informs me that many English chess players intended on watching England lift the world cup and that playing the Commonwealth would have clashed with the games, hence the reduced entry from our neighbours. This information is actually confidential so don't tell anyone I told you.
Did you actually enquire about this Nigel?Nigel Short wrote:No money offered...
I didn't say I did.Nigel Short wrote:why would you expect the ECF to provide support for what is, in the grand scheme of things, a lesser event?
I will not get into a debate about how the ECF should spend its International budget but it has come in for much criticism in the recent past on this issue.Alex McFarlane wrote: I might have been naïve enough to expect that Federations may have given additional support to those representing their nation.
That criticism has mainly been for devoting too much rather than too little of the available funds to the top male players.Alex McFarlane wrote:I will not get into a debate about how the ECF should spend its International budget but it has come in for much criticism in the recent past on this issue.
I agree with that statement.Nigel Short wrote: Just expecting strong players to show up is naive.
The underlying problem is that UK law requires a sport to contain physical exertion. Moving a piece on a board or touching a screen or mouse doesn't count. Notwithstanding that other European countries ignore it for chess, it's actually a Council of Europe definition.Peter D Williams wrote: Have you done anything to get chess seen as a sport by parliament?
You would need to change two words to include Chess (and Bridge, Draughts, Backgammon, Poker, Scrabble, Magic: The Gathering etc.)Sport means all forms of physical activity which, through casual or organised participation, aim at expressing or improving physical fitness and mental well-being, forming social relationships or obtaining results in competitions at all levels.
Sport means all forms of activity which, through casual or organised participation, aim at expressing or improving physical fitness or mental well-being, forming social relationships or obtaining results in competitions at all levels.