An introduction...

Discuss anything you like about women's chess at home and abroad.
Michele Clack
Posts: 437
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 2:38 pm
Location: Worcestershire

Re: An introduction...

Post by Michele Clack » Sat May 08, 2010 6:38 pm

I don't think anyone was proposing a complete raft of segregated chess, just the occasional event to help girls network and realise there are other girls like them playing chess. The number of men commenting that they would hate the 4NCL to drop the woman player rule because they like the playing atmosphere at 4NCL compared to other competitions where there are few women suggests that more women players coming into chess would be welcome. For that to happen long term you have to encourage girls who might be feeling rather isolated.

Mike Truran
Posts: 2393
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:44 pm

Re: An introduction...

Post by Mike Truran » Sat May 08, 2010 7:12 pm

I would venture to suggest (at the risk of being shot down in flames) that the presence of women players at the 4NCL generally has an excellent civilising effect......

Alex Holowczak
Posts: 9085
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 5:18 pm
Location: Oldbury, Worcestershire

Re: An introduction...

Post by Alex Holowczak » Sat May 08, 2010 7:23 pm

It's noteworthy that in this thread, the men seem more in favour of the gender rule than the women this rule is supposed to be supporting.

Mike Truran
Posts: 2393
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:44 pm

Re: An introduction...

Post by Mike Truran » Sat May 08, 2010 7:32 pm

Not sure drawing a conclusion from a total of three women contributing is statistically valid? (Then again, the fact that only three women have contributed to the debate maybe says something about the state of women's chess in the UK).

Alex Holowczak
Posts: 9085
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 5:18 pm
Location: Oldbury, Worcestershire

Re: An introduction...

Post by Alex Holowczak » Sat May 08, 2010 7:44 pm

Agreed, and I'm not sure of how much experience they each have of a 4NCL weekend. Would be an interesting survey to conduct though...

Louise Sinclair
Posts: 258
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:29 am
Location: London

Re: An introduction...

Post by Louise Sinclair » Sun May 09, 2010 2:58 pm

I captained a 4NCL squad for the NCCL on the strict understanding that I was a non playing captain. I refused to go along with acting as the token female player. It was not a happy experience as we had difficulties finding a woman who would play and a couple of the team were somewhat sniffy when she didn't win. The lady decided against playing further matches and frankly I couldn't blame her.
When I joined my first chess club I was the only woman there. However the strongest player in the club took me under his wing and I didn't feel intimidated because there weren't any other female players. Men are 50% of the human race - why on earth should it be assumed that a woman would feel ill at ease with them. Hell most of us go as far as to marry a guy.
I think the men favour the gender rule because
a) it keeps women out of the way in a female chess ghetto
b) it saves them making excuses when they are beaten by a woman.
Louise
You might very well think that ; I couldn't possibly comment.
' you turn if you want. The lady's not for turning'

User avatar
Gareth Harley-Yeo
Posts: 307
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:58 pm
Location: Wales

Re: An introduction...

Post by Gareth Harley-Yeo » Tue May 11, 2010 11:55 am

Louise Sinclair wrote:I captained a 4NCL squad for the NCCL on the strict understanding that I was a non playing captain. I refused to go along with acting as the token female player. It was not a happy experience as we had difficulties finding a woman who would play and a couple of the team were somewhat sniffy when she didn't win. The lady decided against playing further matches and frankly I couldn't blame her.
When I joined my first chess club I was the only woman there. However the strongest player in the club took me under his wing and I didn't feel intimidated because there weren't any other female players. Men are 50% of the human race - why on earth should it be assumed that a woman would feel ill at ease with them. Hell most of us go as far as to marry a guy.
I think the men favour the gender rule because
a) it keeps women out of the way in a female chess ghetto
b) it saves them making excuses when they are beaten by a woman.
Louise
c) Many male chess players don't get out much. It's their only chance to brush shoulders with the fairer sex. :oops:

User avatar
John Upham
Posts: 7218
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 10:29 am
Location: Cove, Hampshire, England.

Re: An introduction...

Post by John Upham » Tue May 11, 2010 12:01 pm

Gareth Harley-Yeo wrote: c) Many male chess players don't get out much. It's their only chance to brush shoulders with the fairer sex. :oops:
Judging from many male chess players appalling dress sense and dubious levels of personal hygiene this is not an incentive for women...

The dreadful jumper seems to be the default mode of dress.
Last edited by John Upham on Tue May 11, 2010 12:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
British Chess News : britishchessnews.com
Twitter: @BritishChess
Facebook: facebook.com/groups/britishchess :D

Louise Sinclair
Posts: 258
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:29 am
Location: London

Re: An introduction...

Post by Louise Sinclair » Tue May 11, 2010 12:02 pm

Gareth
Then you guys should be more welcoming and not suggest female segregation. I met my man at a chess club 25 years ago - it was mutual hate at first sight .....
Louise
You might very well think that ; I couldn't possibly comment.
' you turn if you want. The lady's not for turning'

User avatar
Gareth Harley-Yeo
Posts: 307
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:58 pm
Location: Wales

Re: An introduction...

Post by Gareth Harley-Yeo » Tue May 11, 2010 2:14 pm

Louise Sinclair wrote:Gareth
Then you guys should be more welcoming and not suggest female segregation. I met my man at a chess club 25 years ago - it was mutual hate at first sight .....
Louise
Louise,

I personally disagree with the 4NCL’s women rule. I think people should play in the higher division based on ability not gender. That said I welcome women playing in the same tournaments as men, it certainly does create a more social atmosphere. Maybe that is the Catch-22. Women don’t want to partake in male dominated tournaments, preferring to enter ones where other women are competing, but if no women ever enter, then there will never be these idyllic congresses where both sexes intermingle both on and off the board. I think we need a few ladies to take up the mantle and enter these tournaments so that others get the confidence to enter too.

As for which tournaments are more ‘female friendly’ I think men would love the same conditions that you seem to be asking for, we’re just more willing to slum it in order to get a few games in than women are. It would seem that it is down to the organisers to find the best venues possible, and consider ‘would families be welcome here?’ rather than, ‘the room above the massage parlour is cheap and we can get a good discount’. Sean Hewitt’s e2e4 congresses are a fine example of how a good tournament is run. They should be the benchmark for other tournament organisers.

regards

Gareth ‘a non jumper wearing chess player’ Harley-Yeo

Louise Sinclair
Posts: 258
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:29 am
Location: London

Re: An introduction...

Post by Louise Sinclair » Tue May 11, 2010 2:26 pm

Gareth
I only played tournaments involving men. This is a politically correct idea to cast women as stars in their own events. First females are taught to be victims then they behave as victms with the status accorded to disadvantaged people. Anyone wanting to improve their game should aim to play the strongest opposition possible.
I dislike the 4NCL rule and think people should be playing purely on merit. However most of the wimmins chess does seem to come from men although I know sensible fellows don't approve of gender segregation.
I have played in some crummy venues but it never stopped me having a chat with others during breaks - I once talked to David Bronstein at Hastings and he was kind enough to show me the game he had just finished.
Louise
You might very well think that ; I couldn't possibly comment.
' you turn if you want. The lady's not for turning'

User avatar
David Shepherd
Posts: 912
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 3:46 pm

Re: An introduction...

Post by David Shepherd » Tue May 11, 2010 3:25 pm

The 4NCL doesn't have a "women rule" - it has a mixed team rule which is not the same thing, it is only the current shortage of women players compared to men that make it know by many as the "women rule".

Alex Holowczak
Posts: 9085
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 5:18 pm
Location: Oldbury, Worcestershire

Re: An introduction...

Post by Alex Holowczak » Tue May 11, 2010 3:38 pm

David Shepherd wrote:The 4NCL doesn't have a "women rule" - it has a mixed team rule which is not the same thing, it is only the current shortage of women players compared to men that make it know by many as the "women rule".
It's a politically correct way of phrasing the rule with the intentions of getting more female players involved in Division One.

User avatar
Gareth Harley-Yeo
Posts: 307
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:58 pm
Location: Wales

Re: An introduction...

Post by Gareth Harley-Yeo » Tue May 11, 2010 3:51 pm

Alex Holowczak wrote:
David Shepherd wrote:The 4NCL doesn't have a "women rule" - it has a mixed team rule which is not the same thing, it is only the current shortage of women players compared to men that make it know by many as the "women rule".
It's a politically correct way of phrasing the rule with the intentions of getting more female players involved in Division One.
Like I said... a women rule :mrgreen:

Louise Sinclair
Posts: 258
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:29 am
Location: London

Re: An introduction...

Post by Louise Sinclair » Tue May 11, 2010 3:56 pm

Yes a woman rule without a doubt. It reminds me of tournaments which offer a prize to the highest scoring woman in the open section. I don't see them offering the prize to the highest scoring man if a woman wins it outright. I once asked a tournament organiser if he was offering a prize to the best man if a woman won the tournament.
His reply "don't be silly"
Louise
You might very well think that ; I couldn't possibly comment.
' you turn if you want. The lady's not for turning'