Re: Women's World Championship 2-25 December 2010
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 2:16 pm
Which site are you using to follow the games? The official one isn't working for me. I'm waiting to go home but want to see how the match finishes first.
The independent home for discussions on the English Chess scene.
https://www.ecforum.org.uk/
The thing is Loz that if they abolish such charges, the lost revenue would presumaby have to be recovered some other way - e.g. reduced fees or prizes, or increased entry fees, or something else.LozCooper wrote:This is not a new complaint but one that occurs in practically ever major FIDE event. I hope that they will listen, but I have my doubts.
I agree if it's a self financing tournament and the budget has to be balanced but where you have a sponsor putting in money as is generally the case with top events then i don't believe in overcharging the players and forcing them to stay in specific hotels and pay more than a normal guest would.Sean Hewitt wrote:The thing is Loz that if they abolish such charges, the lost revenue would presumaby have to be recovered some other way - reduced fees or prizes, or increased entry fees.LozCooper wrote:This is not a new complaint but one that occurs in practically ever major FIDE event. I hope that they will listen, but I have my doubts.
The budget has to be balanced even if you have a sponsor! Once you loose a revenue stream (even if you have a sponsor) you either need to replace that revenue, or cut costs to the same value.LozCooper wrote:I agree if it's a self financing tournament and the budget has to be balanced but where you have a sponsor putting in money as is generally the case with top events then i don't believe in overcharging the players and forcing them to stay in specific hotels and pay more than a normal guest would.Sean Hewitt wrote:The thing is Loz that if they abolish such charges, the lost revenue would presumaby have to be recovered some other way - reduced fees or prizes, or increased entry fees.LozCooper wrote:This is not a new complaint but one that occurs in practically ever major FIDE event. I hope that they will listen, but I have my doubts.
The thing is Loz that if they abolish such charges, the lost revenue would presumaby have to be recovered some other way - reduced fees or prizes, or increased entry fees.[/quote]LozCooper wrote:This is not a new complaint but one that occurs in practically ever major FIDE event. I hope that they will listen, but I have my doubts.
Then the ECF should be organising all these events in England!LozCooper wrote:I am quietly confident that neither FIDE nor the organisers will ever be out of pocket for these events.
Thankfully the European Individual in France this March is much better, players have complete freedom of where to stay and don't have to book through the organiser which seems much better and is certainly much cheaper. I anticipate about a third of the cost compared to the women who played in Turkey. Sadly the European Women's Individual seems to be bogged down in politics between Turkey and the ECU so I've no idea if that will take place or not.Sean Hewitt wrote:Then the ECF should be organising all these events in England!LozCooper wrote:I am quietly confident that neither FIDE nor the organisers will ever be out of pocket for these events.
When I looked at bidding for an ECU event, the amount of income that we would need to generate to break even was absolutely frightening!
Sean Hewitt wrote:The budget has to be balanced even if you have a sponsor!
I cannot claim extensive research, but a quick check against a well-known French budget hotel chain's website suggested that the FFE's price might be marginally cheaper ( as one might hope).LozCooper wrote:
Thankfully the European Individual in France this March is much better, players have complete freedom of where to stay and don't have to book through the organiser which seems much better and is certainly much cheaper. .
I think the key points are that they should have got the price below € 110 (4NCL and e2e4 seem to manage this in high cost UK) and that they shouldn't have been taking nearly 20% mark up on the price they got from the hotel. An event with a large number of participants should get the hotel public rooms for next to nothing.We paid exactly 110 € for each single room (full board) in Antakya. And 2.000 € per day to rent the hall we used during the event. We made 20 € profit each day for each single occupancy room used by the players!
Does anyone else find it strange that they have yet to announce dates for the 2012 Olympiad and yet we have them for Norway in 2014? I am beginning to wonder if that will now take place and I can't get an answer from anyone about the matter.Roger de Coverly wrote:There's a king sized moan from the Turkish Organisers at http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7004
They do however put their hands up to one of the central complaints, which is that they were treating the players as a profit centre.
I think the key points are that they should have got the price below € 110 (4NCL and e2e4 seem to manage this in high cost UK) and that they shouldn't have been taking nearly 20% mark up on the price they got from the hotel. An event with a large number of participants should get the hotel public rooms for next to nothing.We paid exactly 110 € for each single room (full board) in Antakya. And 2.000 € per day to rent the hall we used during the event. We made 20 € profit each day for each single occupancy room used by the players!