Michael, in response to your post immediately above, I and not "Surrey" was the first to draw attention on the forum to the unconfirmed result.
I did it entirely on my own initiative based solely on the info on the Surrey & the ECF "oxfordfusion" results sites. Although I play chess in and for the county of Surrey I do not merit being mistaken for it.
I've never had any communication with anyone regarding the match in question and, although I was aware of the anomaly for several days, I only posted what (and all) I knew about it (in my post that you quoted, above) when this thread first started - because it failed to show that there was a problem with the result of the U-180 match Surrey-Lancs.
Due to what I have stated, above, namely my total lack of actual involvement in the matter, apart from as an interested bystander, I have also refrained from posting in this thread. I simply pointed out three facts (and had nothing to add) -
First, that the result was unconfirmed on the official ECF results site.
Second, that on the Surrey site the match result was still undecided due to a dispute on 16th bd.
Third, that the Lancs. player on that board was William O'Rourke.
Make of that what you will but, rest assured, it was all of my own making.
To find a for(u)m that accommodates the mess, that is the task of the artist now. (Samuel Beckett)