Paul McKeown wrote:
Rob Thompson wrote:
Paul McKeown wrote:
Named by John Hemmings in the Commons using Parliamentary Privilege. Busted injunction.
I wouldn't be so sure. It's not that simple with regards to contempt law. Just because he has revealed the name, doesn't necessarily remove the injunction.
Can you state in what way Parliamentary Privilege is not absolute in this regard?
THere was some gap between Giggs being named in Parliament and most news sources naming the person who'd been named.
At first many (e.g. BBC radio, Independent website, Telegraph website) were saying that the footballer had been named in Parliament but not saying who the footballer was.
The Guardian, on the other hand, just came out with it and said it was Giggs.
BBC radio justified their initial reticence by saying Parliamentary Privilege meant that John Hemmings could say what he wanted but they wanted a double check legal opinion as to whether they could report fully what he said.
_________________
http://www.streathambrixtonchess.blogspot.com"Of all the stupid questions so far, This one is particularly annoying, and irrelevant and when I meet you, I propose to write it down on cardboard and nail it to your face."
- Jerry Sadowitz