The English Language

A section to discuss matters not related to Chess in particular.
Roger de Coverly
Posts: 21315
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by Roger de Coverly » Wed Mar 08, 2017 9:54 am

soheil_hooshdaran wrote: it is hard to imagine that such a move can occur in this position, devoid as it is of any tactical flavor
The actual position and move might help place it in context, but the likely meaning is that it's a quiet move in a position that is otherwise full of tactical blows and forcing variations.

soheil_hooshdaran
Posts: 3148
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by soheil_hooshdaran » Thu Mar 09, 2017 7:03 am

I guess the position is not tactical.
Here is the game:

My post is, as you can see, a part of the comment to White's move 25

Roger de Coverly
Posts: 21315
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by Roger de Coverly » Thu Mar 09, 2017 8:38 am

soheil_hooshdaran wrote: My post is, as you can see, a part of the comment to White's move 25
I think the comment is related to the sudden appearance of the O-O-O idea with a threat. It can be easy to overlook that a piece on b2 can be vulnerable if long castling is legal. Korchnoi once even asked whether it was legal to move a Rook through a threatened square.

soheil_hooshdaran
Posts: 3148
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by soheil_hooshdaran » Thu Mar 09, 2017 9:23 pm

askedd who? When?

Roger de Coverly
Posts: 21315
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by Roger de Coverly » Thu Mar 09, 2017 9:38 pm

soheil_hooshdaran wrote:askedd who? When?
The arbiter during his 1974 Candidates Final against Karpov.

soheil_hooshdaran
Posts: 3148
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by soheil_hooshdaran » Fri Mar 10, 2017 8:36 pm

How do u k now that?

User avatar
Matt Mackenzie
Posts: 5237
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
Location: Millom, Cumbria

Re: The English Language

Post by Matt Mackenzie » Fri Mar 10, 2017 9:07 pm

Korchnoi himself admitted it later.
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)

soheil_hooshdaran
Posts: 3148
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by soheil_hooshdaran » Fri Mar 10, 2017 10:04 pm

Matt Mackenzie wrote:Korchnoi himself admitted it later.
Where?

User avatar
Matt Mackenzie
Posts: 5237
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
Location: Millom, Cumbria

Re: The English Language

Post by Matt Mackenzie » Fri Mar 10, 2017 10:05 pm

In his biography "Chess Is My Life", amongst other places.
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)

soheil_hooshdaran
Posts: 3148
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by soheil_hooshdaran » Fri Mar 10, 2017 10:06 pm

What's the difference between 'well done' and 'excellent'?

soheil_hooshdaran
Posts: 3148
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by soheil_hooshdaran » Fri Mar 10, 2017 10:07 pm

Matt Mackenzie wrote:In his biography "Chess Is My Life", amongst other places.
Do you buy all biographies?Aren't they expensive?

soheil_hooshdaran
Posts: 3148
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by soheil_hooshdaran » Sat Mar 11, 2017 12:56 pm

What does it mean that

The key is to notice that the combination of Black's misplaced

knight on a5, loose knight on d7, and flimsy pawn on e5 give White ample opportunity to use his strong piece coordination to get effect.
My problem is the meaning of "get effect".

Mike Truran
Posts: 2393
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:44 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by Mike Truran » Sat Mar 11, 2017 6:31 pm

It's a misprint for "to good effect".

soheil_hooshdaran
Posts: 3148
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by soheil_hooshdaran » Sat Mar 11, 2017 6:34 pm

Hoq are you sure?

E Michael White
Posts: 1420
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 6:31 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by E Michael White » Sat Mar 11, 2017 6:43 pm

Mike Truran wrote:It's a misprint for "to good effect".
That requires 3 insertions and 2 deletions. So it might be a misprint for "to great effect" which requires only 2 insertions.