A section to discuss matters not related to Chess in particular.
-
Mike Truran
- Posts: 2393
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:44 pm
Post
by Mike Truran » Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:03 pm
That requires 3 insertions and 2 deletions. So it might be a misprint for "to great effect" which requires only 2 insertions.
You're right!
Hoq are you sure?
Because "get" makes no sense.
Nor does "hoq", to be fair. But Michael and I knew what you meant - just like we knew what the author of your quote meant.
-
soheil_hooshdaran
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm
Post
by soheil_hooshdaran » Fri Mar 17, 2017 8:13 am
What does
Let's look are anther example.
mean?
-
Mike Truran
- Posts: 2393
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:44 pm
Post
by Mike Truran » Fri Mar 17, 2017 9:35 am
It should be "Let's look at another example".
Misprints again.
-
soheil_hooshdaran
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm
Post
by soheil_hooshdaran » Fri Mar 17, 2017 3:06 pm
Why would the author call a support point, a homebase?
-
MartinCarpenter
- Posts: 3053
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 10:58 am
Post
by MartinCarpenter » Fri Mar 17, 2017 3:27 pm
Because they're vaguely synonomynous under certain circumstances.
-
soheil_hooshdaran
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm
Post
by soheil_hooshdaran » Fri Mar 17, 2017 4:06 pm
Does the author want to imply something by this analogy?
-
soheil_hooshdaran
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm
Post
by soheil_hooshdaran » Fri Mar 17, 2017 7:38 pm
What does it mean that the two Bishops complement each other in fine fashion?
-
MartinCarpenter
- Posts: 3053
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 10:58 am
Post
by MartinCarpenter » Fri Mar 17, 2017 8:46 pm
No and good/effective/etc for fine.
-
soheil_hooshdaran
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm
Post
by soheil_hooshdaran » Tue Mar 28, 2017 9:14 am
You mean 'good/effective/etc' are synonymous to 'fine'?
-
MartinCarpenter
- Posts: 3053
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 10:58 am
Post
by MartinCarpenter » Tue Mar 28, 2017 9:35 am
Not in every context by any means. In this one, more or less yes.
-
soheil_hooshdaran
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm
Post
by soheil_hooshdaran » Fri Mar 31, 2017 10:33 am
Thanks
-
soheil_hooshdaran
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm
Post
by soheil_hooshdaran » Fri Mar 31, 2017 10:34 am
What does the author imply by:
Keep an "Eye Out"?
By quoting "Eye Out"??
-
Roger de Coverly
- Posts: 21318
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Post
by Roger de Coverly » Fri Mar 31, 2017 10:38 am
soheil_hooshdaran wrote:What does the author imply by:
Keep an "Eye Out"?
"keep an eye out" is an expression in its own right. It means "watch out for", "be aware of" etc.
-
soheil_hooshdaran
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm
Post
by soheil_hooshdaran » Fri Mar 31, 2017 11:44 am
What does
Chess is much more a science than it is an art (just let that sink in for a moment Cry).
(I mean "sink in").
Last edited by soheil_hooshdaran on Fri Mar 31, 2017 11:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
soheil_hooshdaran
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm
Post
by soheil_hooshdaran » Fri Mar 31, 2017 11:45 am
Roger de Coverly wrote:soheil_hooshdaran wrote:What does the author imply by:
Keep an "Eye Out"?
"keep an eye out" is an expression in its own right. It means "watch out for", "be aware of" etc.
He singled out "Eye Out"