The English Language

A section to discuss matters not related to Chess in particular.
soheil_hooshdaran
Posts: 3148
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by soheil_hooshdaran » Sat Jun 17, 2017 8:49 pm

means good-looking combination?

MartinCarpenter
Posts: 3048
Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 10:58 am

Re: The English Language

Post by MartinCarpenter » Sun Jun 18, 2017 9:56 am

That's a long way off all of it.

Initially good looking/striking but without much genuine depth behind it. That perhaps isn't even quite right.

soheil_hooshdaran
Posts: 3148
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by soheil_hooshdaran » Sun Jun 18, 2017 2:06 pm

MartinCarpenter wrote: That perhaps isn't even quite right.
What isn't e3ven quite right?

Barry Sandercock
Posts: 1356
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 10:52 am

Re: The English Language

Post by Barry Sandercock » Sun Jun 18, 2017 5:40 pm

Saying " a pretty little " combination doesn't really mean much. A combination is either sound or it isn't. It probably means it is attractive or unexpected. But then, most combinations are.

soheil_hooshdaran
Posts: 3148
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by soheil_hooshdaran » Sun Jun 18, 2017 8:27 pm

What's the difference between a poor and a weak move?

Barry Sandercock
Posts: 1356
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 10:52 am

Re: The English Language

Post by Barry Sandercock » Mon Jun 19, 2017 11:03 am

No difference.

soheil_hooshdaran
Posts: 3148
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by soheil_hooshdaran » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:28 pm

So why would you call it poor?

Roger de Coverly
Posts: 21315
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by Roger de Coverly » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:33 pm

soheil_hooshdaran wrote:What's the difference between a poor and a weak move?
You might say that a poor move is a failure to play one of the better moves in a position, whilst a weak move is one that manifestly worsens the position. Perhaps the difference between failing to notice win of material and actually leaving material en prise.

soheil_hooshdaran
Posts: 3148
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by soheil_hooshdaran » Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:07 am

You mean if a move is poor, it just means it's not the best move?

Roger de Coverly
Posts: 21315
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by Roger de Coverly » Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:18 am

soheil_hooshdaran wrote:You mean if a move is poor, it just means it's not the best move?
It has to fall short of being the best move by some margin. If the best move wins fairly quickly, the second and third best moves still win, it's only when you get to moves that make the win extremely difficult that you might call them poor.

But the authors you translate may have a different interpretation.

soheil_hooshdaran
Posts: 3148
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by soheil_hooshdaran » Tue Jun 20, 2017 7:20 pm

Is it a useless move?

soheil_hooshdaran
Posts: 3148
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by soheil_hooshdaran » Tue Jun 20, 2017 7:20 pm

What's the difference between a blunder and a mistake?

User avatar
IM Jack Rudd
Posts: 4826
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:13 am
Location: Bideford

Re: The English Language

Post by IM Jack Rudd » Tue Jun 20, 2017 8:21 pm

All blunders are mistakes, but not all mistakes are blunders. A blunder is a particularly bad mistake.

soheil_hooshdaran
Posts: 3148
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by soheil_hooshdaran » Wed Jun 21, 2017 4:13 pm

So it's the same as a grave error?

User avatar
IM Jack Rudd
Posts: 4826
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:13 am
Location: Bideford

Re: The English Language

Post by IM Jack Rudd » Wed Jun 21, 2017 6:12 pm

Yes, that would be a reasonable synonym.