The English Language

[soheil_hooshdaran]

Surprisingly, not! But it has:
Unlike static data, the time series of a feature comprise values changed with time.

But I again am unsure if it mean some values are dynamic or all of them do.

[soheil_hooshdaran]

What does it mean to train your big guns on a pawn?

[Barry Sandercock]

It means to attack a pawn with your Queen and/or Rooks.

[soheil_hooshdaran]

Why big guns? is it an idiom or should be translated word-by-word?

[Barry Sandercock]

Yes, an idiom."Big guns"meaning the most powerful objects.

[soheil_hooshdaran]

What does skirmish mean in:
I won the game after the following skirmish
?

[Ian Thompson]

What does skirmish mean in:
I won the game after the following skirmish
?

Another military term, like big guns. It probably means "after the following sequence of tactical moves". We'd need to see the game to be sure.

[soheil_hooshdaran]

[Event "?"]<br> [Site "?"]<br> [Date "????.??.??"]<br> [Round "?"]<br> [White "?"]<br> [Black "?"]<br> [Result "*"]<br> [SetUp "1"]<br> [FEN "r5r1/4bk2/1n2pp2/p1p2n1p/2PpNP2/3N2PP/PP1B4/3KR1R1 w - - 0 15"]<br> 15. b3 a4 16. Ndxc5 axb3 17. axb3 Nxg3 18.<br> Rxg3 Rxg3 19. Nxg3 Bxc5 20. f5 $2 exf5 21. Nxf5 d3 22. Bc3 Ra3 23. Kd2 Rxb3 24.<br> Ra1 Bb4 25. Ra7+ Kg6 26. Ne7+ Kg5 27. Bxb4 Nxc4+ 28. Ke1 Rxb4 29. Rd7 Rb1+ 30.<br> Kf2 Rb2+ 31. Kg1 d2 *
Before move 15, he says he won the game after the "following skirmishes".

[soheil_hooshdaran]

He says Black Bishop is a good Bishop and White's is a bad one. and continues: 'This bit of name calling lead us to believe that Black's Bishop is superior.'
Why did he use 'superior' and not 'better'?

[Roger de Coverly]

'
Why did he use 'superior' and not 'better'?

Writing style perhaps, there's no great difference in meaning.

[soheil_hooshdaran]

'
Why did he use 'superior' and not 'better'?

Writing style perhaps, there's no great difference in meaning.

None at all?
Possible that he means something...

IGM & FST Seirawan is not a random person

[Ian Thompson]

None at all?
Possible that he means something...

IGM & FST Seirawan is not a random person

It is poor writing style to repeatedly use the same word so Seirawan may just be varying the words he uses to make it read better.

[soheil_hooshdaran]

None at all?
Possible that he means something...

IGM & FST Seirawan is not a random person

It is poor writing style to repeatedly use the same word so Seirawan may just be varying the words he uses to make it read better.

I think poor here means inconsistent with your liking (somehow). What about poor piece (Bishop)?

[Barry Sandercock]

If something is superior, it is better. So both have the same meaning in this case.

[soheil_hooshdaran]

None at all?
Possible that he means something...

IGM & FST Seirawan is not a random person

It is poor writing style to repeatedly use the same word so Seirawan may just be varying the words he uses to make it read better.

I think poor here means inconsistent with your liking (somehow). What about poor piece (Bishop)?

Waiting for answer...