The 2001 Fischer internet hoax
-
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2021 10:40 am
- Location: Barrow, England
Re: The 2001 Fischer internet hoax
i put in the moves and do manual analysis checked by the computer not instigated by it
-
- Posts: 1057
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 6:40 pm
Re: The 2001 Fischer internet hoax
Oh really? So 90% accuracy isn't grounds for suspicion then? What about 95% or 99%? Where is the line?AlanLlewellyn wrote: ↑Tue Sep 13, 2022 10:19 pmshow me any evidence i do appart from 90% accuracy which could mean i am very good.
Donate to Sabrina's fundraiser at https://gofund.me/aeae42c7 to support victims of sexual abuse in the chess world.
Northumberland webmaster, Jesmond CC something-or-other. Views mine. Definitely below the Goodall Line.
Northumberland webmaster, Jesmond CC something-or-other. Views mine. Definitely below the Goodall Line.
-
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2021 10:40 am
- Location: Barrow, England
Re: The 2001 Fischer internet hoax
what i have done to get to 90% accuracy is study every mistake ive ever made on a computer according to its sensitivities then remembered how i should play lines accordingly, and it has vastly improved my game because i have a good memory and it has improved my vision.Chris Goodall wrote: ↑Wed Sep 14, 2022 12:47 amOh really? So 90% accuracy isn't grounds for suspicion then? What about 95% or 99%? Where is the line?AlanLlewellyn wrote: ↑Tue Sep 13, 2022 10:19 pmshow me any evidence i do appart from 90% accuracy which could mean i am very good.
-
- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:05 pm
- Location: Evesham
Re: The 2001 Fischer internet hoax
Alan Llewellyn has now been removed from the forum after receiving his third and final warning for posting utter nonsense.
Cheers
Carl Hibbard
Carl Hibbard