Mick Norris wrote:
I am more concerned with running out of time at the venue than with FIDE (or specifically, that's what I expect to hear from our opponents)
Sure, I was just making you aware of the necessary rule changes!
Mick Norris wrote:
Discussed it briefly at the Manchester Autumn Congress this pm, which is using incremental time controls for the first time, and it was suggested 30 sec increment would be better
I wondered about 40/100 or 36/70 followed by 10 min with 30 sec from the start? That would give a break even of 40 moves after the time control, with the same amount of time as normal to the time control
I agree that a 30-second increment is the ideal increment, but Sean's point about venues closing makes me wonder if that's practical. I don't like using increments shorter than that, because it's non-trivial to know if moves still need to be recorded. I'd be happy to play to your suggested time control, assuming it was practical.