ECF Director wants to scrap Clarke grading system
-
- Posts: 8838
- Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
- Location: London
Re: ECF Director wants to scrap Clarke grading system
IGRC = Independent Constitutional and Governance Review Commission
http://www.ecforum.org.uk/viewtopic.php ... 7&p=158867
(Sod's Law dictated that this posted appeared on a new page - it was intended to clarify David's use of the acronym in the post immediately preceding this one.)
EDIT: On closer inspection, I see David left a 'G' out of the acronym, which should be ICGRC!
http://www.ecforum.org.uk/viewtopic.php ... 7&p=158867
(Sod's Law dictated that this posted appeared on a new page - it was intended to clarify David's use of the acronym in the post immediately preceding this one.)
EDIT: On closer inspection, I see David left a 'G' out of the acronym, which should be ICGRC!
-
- Posts: 8473
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: ECF Director wants to scrap Clarke grading system
An interesting assumption, though of course quite wrong. This Board is admittedly an unusual beast since, as Andrew has already pointed out, while the executives do report to the CEO, he has no power to control them. That is presumably the way Council wants it.David Robertson wrote:NickFaulks wrote:I don't see how it is the function of the CEO to instruct elected officers on how to conduct themselves.
That's because you don't grasp how a Board must work, as distinct from any old committee
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
Re: ECF Director wants to scrap Clarke grading system
On closer inspection? You should get down to Specsavers. Sharpish!Christopher Kreuzer wrote:On closer inspection, I see David left a 'G' out of the acronym, which should be ICGRC!
-
- Posts: 8838
- Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
- Location: London
Re: ECF Director wants to scrap Clarke grading system
Heh, I should have said "left a 'C' out of the acronym"... Ironically, I have recently had an eye test and no change in my prescription. ICGRC is a bit of an unwieldy acronym, to be fair to us both.
-
- Posts: 1838
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:16 am
Re: ECF Director wants to scrap Clarke grading system
No mention in last newsletter to members.
Not sure that players want monthly list (otherwise they will all have gone for Gold/Platinum).
On leagues some have been deliberately vague on strength. Though players & match captains may be unaware of it.
Interesting put together with other posts.
Not sure that players want monthly list (otherwise they will all have gone for Gold/Platinum).
On leagues some have been deliberately vague on strength. Though players & match captains may be unaware of it.
Interesting put together with other posts.
-
- Posts: 21322
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: ECF Director wants to scrap Clarke grading system
It's a strategic planning decision.Nick Grey wrote:No mention in last newsletter to members.
It's already been noted that it's a three way choice
(1) abandon the longstanding BCF/ECF methods in favour of an Elo based approach.
(2) modify the current methods in favour of those developed in Yorkshire.
(3) reject the proposed changes.
-
- Posts: 2075
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 9:23 pm
- Location: Harrogate
Re: ECF Director wants to scrap Clarke grading system
Regarding the newsletter I would suspect that it will be mentioned in the next one. Obviously new initiatives, particularly far reaching ones such as this, have to be announced for the first time somewhere. Besides, it's not as if the ECF are introducing this overnight.Roger de Coverly wrote:It's a strategic planning decision.Nick Grey wrote:No mention in last newsletter to members.
It's already been noted that it's a three way choice
(1) abandon the longstanding BCF/ECF methods in favour of an Elo based approach.
(2) modify the current methods in favour of those developed in Yorkshire.
(3) reject the proposed changes.
Regarding Roger's post above I would note that Alex never mentioned Yorkshire when setting out his proposals and Brian Valentine stated that he would consider the methods Yorkshire currently use.
I think the main questions we need to ask are a) what methods are used to rate amateur chess in other countries (which - let's face it - often have a far more lively scene) and b) why England should be any different? Why shouldn't we look at more up to the minute reporting using online systems? Yes, some leagues may have to review their rules but it's not as if they're being told by the ECF they have to play Fischer Random chess instead! Progress should not be held back by parochial attitudes.
Controller - Yorkshire League
Chairman - Harrogate Chess Club
All views expressed entirely my own
Chairman - Harrogate Chess Club
All views expressed entirely my own
-
- Posts: 2393
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:44 pm
Re: ECF Director wants to scrap Clarke grading system
Progress should not be held back by parochial attitudes.
-
- Posts: 10382
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Re: ECF Director wants to scrap Clarke grading system
No, they shouldn't, but the main question is what is actually going to get through Council, with votes dominated currently by leagues and congresses (as usual, whereas the main question should be what is best for English chess/chessplayers, that isn't how things currently work)Andrew Zigmond wrote:I think the main questions we need to ask are a) what methods are used to rate amateur chess in other countries (which - let's face it - often have a far more lively scene) and b) why England should be any different? Why shouldn't we look at more up to the minute reporting using online systems? Yes, some leagues may have to review their rules but it's not as if they're being told by the ECF they have to play Fischer Random chess instead! Progress should not be held back by parochial attitudes.
Or is the idea to wait until Council is "reformed"?
Any postings on here represent my personal views
-
- Posts: 21322
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: ECF Director wants to scrap Clarke grading system
In the past, has any Board had the courage to put to the voting membership the question of whether to abandon the Clarke grading system? The redesign of the 1990s had an intent that it could support any type of calculation engine, whether Clarke, Elo or something else. The implementation of that nearly wrecked the BCF as those who remember the period may recall. But I don't think that "let's adopt Elo" was ever put to the vote. Nor was it, that notwithstanding wordy business plans, did they ever say that a new (to the BCF/ECF) method of rating was to be adopted as a strategic decision.Mick Norris wrote: but the main question is what is actually going to get through Council, with votes dominated currently by leagues and congresses
If you think about implementation, dummy parallel running as with the regrading exercise would seem essential. You would want to know that your Elo parameters as adopted didn't restore you to a position where you had top juniors of a 200 to 210 standard retaining Elo ratings equivalent to 150 or 160. Dummy parallel running could bring in Congresses monthly, but leagues six monthly.
Members of Council have far longer memories than ECF Directors. They are going to recall that the grading team went off on a project to change everyone's grade without ever getting voting approval of the project.
-
- Posts: 3053
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 10:58 am
Re: ECF Director wants to scrap Clarke grading system
That'd definitely be thing to do just calculate/run monthly grades as a shadow system to the 6/12 monthly ones. Basically 'just' for the added amusement/interest. Incredibly hard to raise a principled objection to really.
Then if it really takes off you can look at dropping things etc.
Its useful that the ECF (and Yorkshire) systems are such that you can add up your grade a month at a time and get nearly the same result as doing it in one big chunk later on.
(Well, minor +-40 issues possible I guess.).
Then if it really takes off you can look at dropping things etc.
Its useful that the ECF (and Yorkshire) systems are such that you can add up your grade a month at a time and get nearly the same result as doing it in one big chunk later on.
(Well, minor +-40 issues possible I guess.).
-
- Posts: 5839
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm
Re: ECF Director wants to scrap Clarke grading system
If a monthly grading/rating system comes in, some Leagues will not report results as they happen or on a monthly basis. That does not really matter. I don't think ECF really likes team events.
However, I hope Leagues will not be stupid enough to try to impose the monthly gradings/ratings on clubs during the season. Captains have enough problems getting players out, without having to worry about whether the guy who has played for the 4th team for 5 years is suddenly ineligible halfway through the season. If you have leagues where there is an average grade division, at the start of the season, you might be able to run a team, then you might suddenly find that as your players have had a good run, they are not allowed to play in February... Using the same grading/ratings for the duration of the season seems sensible.
However, I hope Leagues will not be stupid enough to try to impose the monthly gradings/ratings on clubs during the season. Captains have enough problems getting players out, without having to worry about whether the guy who has played for the 4th team for 5 years is suddenly ineligible halfway through the season. If you have leagues where there is an average grade division, at the start of the season, you might be able to run a team, then you might suddenly find that as your players have had a good run, they are not allowed to play in February... Using the same grading/ratings for the duration of the season seems sensible.
-
- Posts: 7233
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 10:29 am
- Location: Cove, Hampshire, England.
Re: ECF Director wants to scrap Clarke grading system
I suspect that most leagues would operate the principle that the grading / rating list published at the start of season would be in force for the duration of that season in terms of eligibilty.*
More frequent grading / ratings lists could be used for the purposes of deciding board orders.
Many people (wisely) talk in terms of "playing strength" when determing board orders.
*Allowing for corrections appearing in interim Master Lists.
More frequent grading / ratings lists could be used for the purposes of deciding board orders.
Many people (wisely) talk in terms of "playing strength" when determing board orders.
*Allowing for corrections appearing in interim Master Lists.
British Chess News : britishchessnews.com
Twitter: @BritishChess
Facebook: facebook.com/groups/britishchess
Twitter: @BritishChess
Facebook: facebook.com/groups/britishchess
-
- Posts: 21322
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: ECF Director wants to scrap Clarke grading system
In at least some leagues, results are up on the website as soon as one of the captains returns to a computer or internet connected device. With a bit of tweaking, pairings could be up on the web before the match starts, in the style of the 4NCL. A playing area ban of computers and other devices would preclude real time reporting of the results in the absence of an internet connected arbiter.Kevin Thurlow wrote:If a monthly grading/rating system comes in, some Leagues will not report results as they happen or on a monthly basis. That does not really matter. I don't think ECF really likes team events.
The weakness preventing regular reporting of results for grading is that interfaces between the result system and ECF grading software are not the most developed with the effect that the local graders have to do a certain amount of intervention.
-
- Posts: 8473
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: ECF Director wants to scrap Clarke grading system
That problem is caused by very different sets of games being reported to the two systems, which is a separate issue. No system will ever reflect the results of games which are not reported to it.Roger de Coverly wrote: You would want to know that your Elo parameters as adopted didn't restore you to a position where you had top juniors of a 200 to 210 standard retaining Elo ratings equivalent to 150 or 160.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.