New Grading List

General discussions about grading.
Richard Bates
Posts: 2435
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:27 pm

Re: New Grading List

Postby Richard Bates » Fri Jul 22, 2016 9:30 pm

Downloads section. That's my only clue.

Ray Sayers

Re: New Grading List

Postby Ray Sayers » Fri Jul 22, 2016 9:36 pm

I see how you found it Richard - very clever! And yes - ouch to my grade!

NickFaulks
Posts: 2742
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm

Re: New Grading List

Postby NickFaulks » Fri Jul 22, 2016 9:54 pm

Richard Bates wrote:Just need to know where to look

I give up.

Alan Walton
Posts: 1069
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 8:33 pm
Location: Oldham

Re: New Grading List

Postby Alan Walton » Fri Jul 22, 2016 10:03 pm

Hover over the January link and re-type for July 2016

Brendan O'Gorman
Posts: 472
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 9:10 pm

Re: New Grading List

Postby Brendan O'Gorman » Fri Jul 22, 2016 10:13 pm

Thanks, Alan. Hovering doesn't seem to work on my Mac, but here's the link to download the file: http://www.ecfgrading.org.uk/files/grades201607.csv

Roger de Coverly
Posts: 15082
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm

Re: New Grading List

Postby Roger de Coverly » Fri Jul 22, 2016 10:23 pm

Brendan O'Gorman wrote: but here's the link to download the file: http://www.ecfgrading.org.uk/files/grades201607.csv


Hours (or minutes) of fun with a spreadsheet. Sorting by the most active players seems to suggest, as almost always, that playing a lot doesn't improve your grade, with the possible exception of under 18s. The greatest improvement by an adult over 150 appears to be a well known arbiter, but his "old" grade was well below his career average.

They might yet confound us, with the released file just being a "draft" for review purposes.

Nick Grey
Posts: 438
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:16 am

Re: New Grading List

Postby Nick Grey » Fri Jul 22, 2016 10:59 pm

Some of us were very clear the well known arbiter was going to be no longer eligible for the U160 team but at 179 eligible for U180 & open team if he is able to play. Congratulations David & thanks to Roger for pointing this out. July has a chance for a change & August update is official list.

Thanks to Richard for a nice puzzler to start the w/e with.

Tim Spanton
Posts: 211
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 11:35 am

Re: New Grading List

Postby Tim Spanton » Sat Jul 23, 2016 5:13 am

New list has been published ...

User avatar
Carl Hibbard
Posts: 5392
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:05 pm
Location: Evesham

Re: New Grading List

Postby Carl Hibbard » Sat Jul 23, 2016 8:39 am

So much better on the speed of the grading web site this year so well done.
Cheers
Carl Hibbard

LawrenceCooper
Posts: 3359
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:13 am

Re: New Grading List

Postby LawrenceCooper » Sat Jul 23, 2016 9:16 am

I've had my biggest drop since July 2000 :oops:

David Sedgwick
Posts: 2603
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:56 pm
Location: Croydon

Re: New Grading List

Postby David Sedgwick » Sat Jul 23, 2016 9:22 am

Roger de Coverly wrote:The greatest improvement by an adult over 150 appears to be a well known arbiter, but his "old" grade was well below his career average.


Nick Grey wrote:Some of us were very clear the well known arbiter was going to be no longer eligible for the U160 team but at 179 eligible for U180 & open team if he is able to play. Congratulations David & thanks to Roger for pointing this out. July has a chance for a change & August update is official list.

Thank you both.

I'm staggered and I shall have to check my details carefully. Whether my new found status as "most improved player" survives the August revision remains to be seen.

If it does, it will be something of a shock going from Board 3 or 4 of the Surrey U160 team to Board 1 or 2 of the Surrey U180 team.

Nick, thank you for inviting me to play for the U160 team last season.

Jonathan Bryant
Posts: 2916
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 3:54 pm

Re: New Grading List

Postby Jonathan Bryant » Sat Jul 23, 2016 9:39 am

Richard Bates wrote:
Brendan O'Gorman wrote:Don't be a tease!


153 games Brendan?


Yes, he’s been a bit slack this year.

David Sedgwick
Posts: 2603
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:56 pm
Location: Croydon

Re: New Grading List

Postby David Sedgwick » Sat Jul 23, 2016 9:39 am

Carl Hibbard wrote:So much better on the speed of the grading web site this year so well done.

Absolutely. It is a major achievement to have the list out before the start of the British Championships despite their early start. Congratulations and thanks to all.

Brian Valentine wrote:If members prefer we could delay publication while we co-ordinate a fanfare. Our preference is to get it out as soon as possible given that it is often completed in the early hours of the morning.

I wouldn't expect a fanfare.

However, I do find it rather bizarre that the chosen method of publication was to upload the list but give no indication that that had been done. Kudos to Richard Bates and anyone else who found the list by guessing the URI successfully.

I would have expected there to be announcements at http://www.ecfgrading.org.uk/new/menu.php and at http://www.ecfgrading.org.uk/new/downloads.php at the time of publication.

I appreciate that both are there now. There is a small glitch; the date at the first link needs to be corrected from "dd.07.2017".

The above said, I realise that priority was given to publishing the list at the earliest possible moment.

Leonard Barden
Posts: 1127
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 11:21 am

Re: New Grading List

Postby Leonard Barden » Sat Jul 23, 2016 2:49 pm

A little triumph for the grading system in the British U8 at Bournemouth this afternoon.

In a record field of 70 children, the pairings for round 4 show the top four boards as the Nos 1-8 seeds, seven 3/3 and one 2.5.

LawrenceCooper
Posts: 3359
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:13 am

Re: New Grading List

Postby LawrenceCooper » Sat Jul 23, 2016 3:04 pm

Leonard Barden wrote:A little triumph for the grading system in the British U8 at Bournemouth this afternoon.

In a record field of 70 children, the pairings for round 4 show the top four boards as the Nos 1-8 seeds, seven 3/3 and one 2.5.


Albeit the January grades not the new ones :oops:


Return to “Grading Debate”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests