Re: Dates for 2016 senior events
Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2016 1:04 pm
Why no non-euro team in the third, so-called 'world' team championship?
Well perhaps there is still some time to prove that this new fide venture might live up to its name!? It remains on course, however, to becoming a third successive emperor with no clothes. At present it seems to be no more in effect than a third 'second' euro teams event held each year, as were the last two such events.
I think the 'world's' team event isn't a bad idea. But perhaps it would be better all round if it was contested every 2nd year, with continental events held in alternate years. That would also reduce the current seniors international events congestion (4 per year rather than the more successful, old-regime 3).
Seniors have been asked to consider playing in 3 international events held rapidly in succession this year ... Late April, May and June. Is this a truly sustainable structure going forward?
And, yes: I still believe demand to play in these events would increase if the 65+ sections were replaced by the old 60+ sections. But that's a different point.
Good news!? It seems likely that there will be an open meeting at Radebeul to discuss these as well as a range of other price/quality issues.
Well perhaps there is still some time to prove that this new fide venture might live up to its name!? It remains on course, however, to becoming a third successive emperor with no clothes. At present it seems to be no more in effect than a third 'second' euro teams event held each year, as were the last two such events.
I think the 'world's' team event isn't a bad idea. But perhaps it would be better all round if it was contested every 2nd year, with continental events held in alternate years. That would also reduce the current seniors international events congestion (4 per year rather than the more successful, old-regime 3).
Seniors have been asked to consider playing in 3 international events held rapidly in succession this year ... Late April, May and June. Is this a truly sustainable structure going forward?
And, yes: I still believe demand to play in these events would increase if the 65+ sections were replaced by the old 60+ sections. But that's a different point.
Good news!? It seems likely that there will be an open meeting at Radebeul to discuss these as well as a range of other price/quality issues.