John Upham wrote:
First glances suggest that the bulk of the juniors are still at stratospheric levels. The players who were unrated and had their new rating cocked-up seem to have been toned down a little. I am confident others will analyse the latest attempt to death! I wonder if it was done properly or the craziest errors dealt with on an individual basis to reduce the embarrassment?
I am confident that the changes (and the previous version) all have a sound basis both statistically and mathematically. Otherwise, they would not have been published would they?
Carl, Does the download reflect the latest tranche of bodging?
The latest calculations (whatever they are...) are in force yes - the help and newgrades pages have also been changed