Halfyearly Rapid Grades
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 1:15 pm
Does anyone know when the January 2010 rapidplay grades will be available in the Online Grading Database?
The independent home for discussions on the English Chess scene.
https://www.ecforum.org.uk/
YesMichael Bennett wrote:Does anyone know when the January 2010 rapidplay grades will be available in the Online Grading Database?
Should go live during Sunday I would guess Michael but I will post here when that is so...Michael Bennett wrote:Could you give us a clue?
Hi Carl, can this list be viewed by anyone, if so where can it be found?Carl Hibbard wrote:That new list has just gone live
The standard site that you normally use?J. Moore wrote:Hi Carl, can this list be viewed by anyone, if so where can it be found?Carl Hibbard wrote:That new list has just gone live
But is it right?Carl Hibbard wrote:That new list has just gone live
I think the juniors you've played are treated as ungraded. This makes it virtually impossible to predict your grade.Ian Thompson wrote:But is it right?Carl Hibbard wrote:That new list has just gone live
I played 4 games in this list, all against juniors, scoring 2.5/4. Their average grade in the August 2009 list was 214.5 and their average grade in this list is 209. My grading performance for these 4 games is between 205 and 210.5(*), which means the average grade of my opponents used in the calculation was between 192.5 and 198.
(*) My new grade is 202 based on 23 games, so between 4635 and 4657 points in total. 19 games were from previous years and scored 3815 points, so the 4 new games must have been between 820 and 842 points.
I can only suggest filling in the contact form and Richard will get back to you...Ian Thompson wrote:But is it right?Carl Hibbard wrote:That new list has just gone live
You're right that it makes it impossible to predict your grade, but it shouldn't prevent you from checking the calculation of your own new grade once you know what your opponents' new grades are. However, it does. Now I've got the graders' master list I think I can guess what has been done.Alex Holowczak wrote:I think the juniors you've played are treated as ungraded. This makes it virtually impossible to predict your grade.Ian Thompson wrote: But is it right?
I played 4 games in this list, all against juniors, scoring 2.5/4. Their average grade in the August 2009 list was 214.5 and their average grade in this list is 209. My grading performance for these 4 games is between 205 and 210.5(*), which means the average grade of my opponents used in the calculation was between 192.5 and 198.
(*) My new grade is 202 based on 23 games, so between 4635 and 4657 points in total. 19 games were from previous years and scored 3815 points, so the 4 new games must have been between 820 and 842 points.