Peter D Williams wrote:
Mick Norris wrote:
Peter
Have you read the comment from Jack on the indy media blog? I'm not sure it could be any clearer
Hi Mick
Yes I have, but is this an official statement as it differs from the one on the ECF website? Also not everyone will view the comments posted just the story and that is what will stick in their minds. It really is crucial that the ECF act immediately and establish the facts whatever they are and lets all be honest they don't have a good track record of this. If there is no substance in the allegations (and I sincerely hope there isn't) then this needs to be out in the public domain sooner rather than later - if the ECF are slow or if the family have already made a complaint to the police then it will be taken out of their hands.
Peter
Mud sticks, of course, and I doubt that the outcome of the ECF investigation will be publicised as much as the original allegations, just like I doubt that people willing to immediately think the worst of the ECF will learn anything from their overreaction to the initial story
When you investigate this kind of allegation, you get 2 kinds of criticism - either you haven't acted fast enough, or you haven't taken time to investigate thoroughly
I expect that Phil Ehr dealt with this properly, as I would expect, but I think the chess community asks too much of the ECF volunteers