English Chess Forum

A home for discussions on the English Chess scene.
It is currently Sat Sep 20, 2014 4:58 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Fischer notes
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:26 pm 
Online

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Posts: 11257
ChessBase has a piece about the auction of some notes made by RJF during the famous blitz tournament in 1970 at Herceg Novi (Yugoslavia).

http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=8472

What struck me as odd, is that images of score-sheets from the 1972 match show RJF continuing to use descriptive, whilst these notes are in algebraic.

Perhaps they were intended for publication in an algebraic magazine.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fischer notes
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:13 pm
Posts: 80
Location: Bristol University
Thanks Roger. I thought the same thing when I first saw it; indeed, Fischer was still using descriptive in 1992 (http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/extra/fischergligoric.html)

A letter on the CB article from the son of the tournament organiser says "A book containing all matches from Hercegnovi tournament was published and if I remember correctly, Bobby was paid two million Yugoslav Dinars for his part." Meanwhile Chessgames has a number of Fischer's games from this tournament annotated by him (see http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chess.pl?annotatedby=19233) and the Korchnoi-Fischer game at least matches exactly, so I assume the aforementioned tournament book is their source.

Also note that the game scores are very neat by Fischer's standards - even in slowplay games his writing is almost impossible to read by the end (another example: http://blog.chess.com/qixel/famous-score-sheets2) so I would guess that he recorded the games, quite possibly in descriptive, deciphered his scoresheets (something no-one else has managed to do, judging by the Winter article! :) ) then wrote them up relatively clearly in algebraic later with notes, and gave that to the organiser for the book.

_________________
"A wise man speaks because he has something to say; a fool speaks because he has to say something."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fischer notes
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 5:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 12:21 pm
Posts: 822
I have my doubts about the genuineness of these annotations.

Quite apart from the notation and the uncharacteristic handwriting, the phraseology often isn't Bobby as I remember him.

Just one example: in Fischer v Petrosian (page 44) his opponent's name seems misspelt and he refers a couple of times in Korchnoi v Fischer as quoted by Chessbase to Zagreb 1970 as 'turnir mira' which a Serbo-Croat speaker might do. I believe Bobby would have just referred to Zagreb.

Caveat emptor!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fischer notes
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 11:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 9:29 am
Posts: 142
I've seen these notes published in a book by Dimitrije Bjelica called something like Chess Meets of the Century. The book was in very poor English and contained all the games from the USSR vs. World match and all Fischer's games from the blitz tournament. Sadly, I'm not sure whether I'd be able to find my copy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fischer notes
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 12:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm
Posts: 1240
"I've seen these notes published in a book by Dimitrije Bjelica called something like Chess Meets of the Century. The book was in very poor English and contained all the games from the USSR vs. World match and all Fischer's games from the blitz tournament. Sadly, I'm not sure whether I'd be able to find my copy."

I have that book (and also cannot recall exactly the title or where it is). I seem to remember that Mr Bjelica attracted some unwelcome publicity later. Possibly some misunderstanding has arisen over the authorship of the notes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fischer notes
PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 1:07 pm
Posts: 179
Bjelica certainly did publish a book with that title and content. The purist in me (now largely moribund) was mildly offended at seeing for the first time the word "meet" used as a noun.

If I remember rightly, Fischer actually sued Bjelica over that book - I forget on what grounds. They ran into one another while the case was going on and Bjelica said "I offer you a draw". Fischer, of course, declined. I don't recall hearing about the eventual outcome of the proceedings.

_________________
"The chess-board is the world ..... the player on the other side is hidden from us ..... he never overlooks a mistake, or makes the smallest allowance for ignorance."
(He doesn't let you resign and start again, either.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fischer notes
PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 11:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:10 am
Posts: 345
I am in no doubt that the notes are Bobby's. I have studied handwriting analysis all my life and would bet five quid on it. That they are in algebraic was not to help anybody. Bobby spoke for himself and could record his chess anywhichway but draw. That is Fischer.

If Peter wants to find his book I would urge him to look for a bright orange cover.

Do I take it that all the notes are published elswhere? I'd hate to miss a trick here.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fischer notes
PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 12:26 pm
Posts: 324
Even though I've never having studied handwriting in my life, I'd say that if they're not by Fischer's hand, someone's done a very good job of copying it. Having said that, I was also surprised by the algebraic notation. And everyone makes spelling mistakes every now and then.

James: They were published on ChessBase last week.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fischer notes
PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:34 pm 
Online

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Posts: 11257
Ola Winfridsson wrote:
Having said that, I was also surprised by the algebraic notation.


I would have thought an American writer would not have used a Serbo-Croat phrase internationally little known as the description of the tournament. As Leonard Barden suggested, surely you would just say Zagreb, or if you wanted to be more specific, the Zagreb Peace Tournament . That's more or less how it is described in the "The Chess Player".

http://books.google.co.uk/books/about/T ... edir_esc=y


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fischer notes
PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 8:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 12:26 pm
Posts: 324
Yes, I fully agree that that is odd, as is the comment "Robert Byrne, the American grandmaster". However, isn't it conceivable that Fischer was asked to provide commentary to the games for a Yugoslav audience, and then fell out with mr Bjelica? It wouldn't have been the first time.

Anyway, I'm not bidding for the papers, forgery or not ... :P


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Roger de Coverly and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group