You can also add - no great interest in playing in a summer competition with long distance travelling.David Sedgwick wrote:As I understand it, that was partly because they didn't want to adjust their grading limits to meet the ECF / SCCU structure and partly beacuse they didn't want to place their competitions under the auspices of the SCCU.
The Berkshire / SCCU Situation and Related Matters
-
- Posts: 21322
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: The Berkshire / SCCU Situation and Related Matters
-
- Posts: 7232
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 10:29 am
- Location: Cove, Hampshire, England.
Re: The Berkshire / SCCU Situation and Related Matters
Roger,Roger de Coverly wrote: You can also add - no great interest in playing in a summer competition with long distance travelling.
Are you speaking for all Berkshire players or yourself and a handful of others?
British Chess News : britishchessnews.com
Twitter: @BritishChess
Facebook: facebook.com/groups/britishchess
Twitter: @BritishChess
Facebook: facebook.com/groups/britishchess
-
- Posts: 21322
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: The Berkshire / SCCU Situation and Related Matters
I'm only really speaking for myself and possibly other Bucks players. Outside of the 4NCL and congresses, Saturday/Sunday afternoon chess these days is 6 rounds of Chiltern over the winter plus the Jamboree, not a national competition with potential matches in April, May, June and July.John Upham wrote:
Roger,
Are you speaking for all Berkshire players or yourself and a handful of others?
Last edited by Roger de Coverly on Thu Jul 01, 2010 11:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 7232
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 10:29 am
- Location: Cove, Hampshire, England.
Re: The Berkshire - SCCU dispute
It would appear that you are missing out on a great deal :Roger de Coverly wrote: but I certainly won't be going to Catford
http://www.information-britain.co.uk/co ... deCatford/
http://www.information-britain.co.uk/sh ... ce_ID=2325
and
http://www.aboutbritain.com/towns/catford.asp
I have made contact with the Catford Tourist Board and they have invited a delegation from the Berkshire CA to stay for a fortnight.
British Chess News : britishchessnews.com
Twitter: @BritishChess
Facebook: facebook.com/groups/britishchess
Twitter: @BritishChess
Facebook: facebook.com/groups/britishchess
-
- Posts: 1026
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 4:45 pm
Re: The Berkshire / SCCU Situation and Related Matters
I have little to add from the SCCU point of view to what David and Neill have already said.
Members of Camberley club are welcome to play for Surrey as (although their club is not affiliated to the Surrey Association) it is geographically within Surrey.
For the sake of those unfamiliar with the rules here they are (extracted from the ECF site):
B6. The qualifications for a player to represent a County in any of these Championships shall be one of the following:-
i) Birth in that county.
ii) Five years residence in that county at any time.
iii) Two months immediate previous and present membership of a club either in or affiliated to that County.
iv) One month immediately previous and present residence in that County.
v) Present attendance as a teacher or student at a school, college or university in that County.
Roger: times have changed - Surrey now hosts matches at Cheam or Ashtead (but not Sutton) and I have played against Kent teams at Charlton House (a few years ago) and more recently at Dartford, but never Catford.
History of Surrey disputes: Surrey is used to controversy - before the Association was formed in 1883 the editor of 'the Chessplayer's Chronicle' attacked the proposed constitution (giving certain rights only to members of affiliated clubs) as "materially lessening the popularity of the movement, and, to our minds, will entirely rob it of the right to the designation of a County Association"
Members of Camberley club are welcome to play for Surrey as (although their club is not affiliated to the Surrey Association) it is geographically within Surrey.
For the sake of those unfamiliar with the rules here they are (extracted from the ECF site):
B6. The qualifications for a player to represent a County in any of these Championships shall be one of the following:-
i) Birth in that county.
ii) Five years residence in that county at any time.
iii) Two months immediate previous and present membership of a club either in or affiliated to that County.
iv) One month immediately previous and present residence in that County.
v) Present attendance as a teacher or student at a school, college or university in that County.
Roger: times have changed - Surrey now hosts matches at Cheam or Ashtead (but not Sutton) and I have played against Kent teams at Charlton House (a few years ago) and more recently at Dartford, but never Catford.
History of Surrey disputes: Surrey is used to controversy - before the Association was formed in 1883 the editor of 'the Chessplayer's Chronicle' attacked the proposed constitution (giving certain rights only to members of affiliated clubs) as "materially lessening the popularity of the movement, and, to our minds, will entirely rob it of the right to the designation of a County Association"
-
- Posts: 5839
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm
Re: The Berkshire / SCCU Situation and Related Matters
"History of Surrey disputes: Surrey is used to controversy - before the Association was formed in 1883 the editor of 'the Chessplayer's Chronicle' attacked the proposed constitution (giving certain rights only to members of affiliated clubs) as "materially lessening the popularity of the movement, and, to our minds, will entirely rob it of the right to the designation of a County Association" "
"(giving certain rights only to members of affiliated clubs)" still applies, doesn't it?!
I looked in an old BCM and it was suggested to have a British Chess Federation, and a meeting to discuss this was announced, whereupon Yorkshire complained that they didn't see the point of a BCF and why was the meeting in London? That was in 1903...
"(giving certain rights only to members of affiliated clubs)" still applies, doesn't it?!
I looked in an old BCM and it was suggested to have a British Chess Federation, and a meeting to discuss this was announced, whereupon Yorkshire complained that they didn't see the point of a BCF and why was the meeting in London? That was in 1903...
"Kevin was the arbiter and was very patient. " Nick Grey
-
- Posts: 9085
- Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 5:18 pm
- Location: Oldbury, Worcestershire
Re: The Berkshire / SCCU Situation and Related Matters
I find that attitude towards our governing body quite strange. I can't imagine football clubs in the 1850s thinking the idea of setting up the FA was a bad one.
-
- Posts: 3340
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:27 pm
Re: The Berkshire / SCCU Situation and Related Matters
Well no, but then 99% of them didn't exist! (and the dissenters of those that did exist wanted to play Rugby ).Alex Holowczak wrote:I find that attitude towards our governing body quite strange. I can't imagine football clubs in the 1850s thinking the idea of setting up the FA was a bad one.