English Chess Forum

show me any evidence i do appart from 90% accuracy which could mean i am very good. Oh really? So 90% accuracy isn't grounds for suspicion then? What about 95% or 99%? Where is the line? what i have done to get to 90% accuracy is study every mistake ive ever made on a computer according to its sens...

i recently talked to someone on icc who claimed they were kasparov and he was still going on about deep blue.

thanks joey, i knew nothing of the controversy at the time

i put in the moves and do manual analysis checked by the computer not instigated by it

i do immediately go to the chessbase program after i get home from a otb, i have been scanned twice my electronic equipment i take in a hotel room has been x-rayed twice. I do not cheat show me any evidence i do appart from 90% accuracy which could mean i am very good. i do have a logic iq in the 19...

matt someone asked me for what i know, i answered, it sounding like a load of crazy dribblings-lets forget it

i told you for some reason people dont like the truth

i am not blaspheming i am not saying he is the second coming or anything rediculous like that but in the scheme of things he is significant

the other thing keeping fischer from the public eye is also who he actually is, because he is someone even more important in the world than a chess player

AlanLlewellyn wrote: ↑

Tue Sep 13, 2022 9:37 pm

i have told the truth it was fischer without assistance of any kind. Fischers actual periods of play were different from the image to protect him, also his games were got to from different openings also to protect him.

thats why the russian death squads sent to kill him couldnt find him

fischer wasnt even at his peak in 1997

i have told the truth it was fischer without assistance of any kind. Fischers actual periods of play were different from the image to protect him, also his games were got to from different openings also to protect him.

i have taken a dog poo load of abuse here, you are not so much throwing mud at me as mud from the behind of a dog.

maybe you can remember the summaries of the conclusion from it

but i will get banned for telling the truth