Aaah - thanks v muchIan Thompson wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 3:29 pmSo long as there are an even number of players in the team, so you can divide it in half, it will work. See https://www.4nclresults.co.uk/2022-23/4 ... xport/#t31 and https://www.4nclresults.co.uk/2022-23/4 ... xport/#t31, for example.Tim Spanton wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 3:20 pmExcuse my ignorance, but how does that work with six players a side?Mick Norris wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 12:11 pmTriangular with Wessex B and Oxford 4 by the look of it
Division Four 2022-23
-
- Posts: 1177
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 11:35 am
- Contact:
Re: Division Four 2022-23
-
- Posts: 21183
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: Division Four 2022-23
It relies a bit on teams not changing their board orders. If two teams do this, it's possible to play the same opponent twice.Ian Thompson wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 3:29 pmSo long as there are an even number of players in the team, so you can divide it in half, it will work.
- IM Jack Rudd
- Posts: 4763
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:13 am
- Location: Bideford
- Contact:
Re: Division Four 2022-23
I think there might be a rule in there saying that you can't play on an odd board in one round of a triangular and an even board in the other, but I'd have to check.
-
- Posts: 6978
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:13 am
Re: Division Four 2022-23
That was certainly the advice I was given when my teams have been involved.IM Jack Rudd wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 8:52 pmI think there might be a rule in there saying that you can't play on an odd board in one round of a triangular and an even board in the other, but I'd have to check.
-
- Posts: 5677
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm
Re: Division Four 2022-23
SPTW Lionesses vs Oxford 4, round 4, but not the same opponent.
-
- Posts: 3482
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:31 pm
- Location: Awbridge, Hampshire
Re: Division Four 2022-23
Boards 714 and 715 of https://www.4nclresults.co.uk/2022-23/4 ... xport/#t31 were the same players, but not the same colours each game.Kevin Thurlow wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 10:51 pmSPTW Lionesses vs Oxford 4, round 4, but not the same opponent.
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 2:55 pm
Re: Division Four 2022-23
I have two extra twin rooms for Mercure Daventry this weekend. Anyone interested in having them please write to me:
https://www.sheplaystowin.co.uk/contact-us
https://www.sheplaystowin.co.uk/contact-us
-
- Posts: 10145
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Re: Division Four 2022-23
They are on 5/5 now, only 2 points behind the 2 joint leaders, and level with 2 others; they are yet to play the other 4 contendersJoey Stewart wrote: ↑Sat Jan 07, 2023 10:36 pmWessex came back with a bang - winning 6-0 in their first game. If by some miracle they make it back into the promotion spots it would be the biggest starting deficit any team has ever overcome
round 8 pairings
Any postings on here represent my personal views
-
- Posts: 5677
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm
Re: Division Four 2022-23
I see Oxford 4 have their second triangular match.
More importantly, I think I spotted Tim Spanton, Ian Thompson and Stewart Reuben today - all in the same room, in England!
More importantly, I think I spotted Tim Spanton, Ian Thompson and Stewart Reuben today - all in the same room, in England!
-
- Posts: 655
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 4:10 pm
- Location: Abingdon
Re: Division Four 2022-23
I believe there was a late withdrawal which caused a last minute rerrangement of the fixtures,
-
- Posts: 3482
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:31 pm
- Location: Awbridge, Hampshire
Re: Division Four 2022-23
and today we have the same again on boards 712 - 715 - https://www.4nclresults.co.uk/2022-23/4 ... xport/#t32 .Ian Thompson wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 11:15 pmBoards 714 and 715 of https://www.4nclresults.co.uk/2022-23/4 ... xport/#t31 were the same players, but not the same colours each game.Kevin Thurlow wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 10:51 pmSPTW Lionesses vs Oxford 4, round 4, but not the same opponent.
... until the pairings were changed, presumably by agreement as the new Crowthorne board order breaches the border order rules.
-
- Posts: 10145
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Re: Division Four 2022-23
Well done to the Woodpushers, who proved anything but Average to win only conceding 2 drawn matchesNeil Graham wrote: ↑Tue Nov 08, 2022 11:33 amThere are two outstanding teams in the Division with average ratings in excess of 2050 for the two rounds. They are Average Woodpushers "A" who were able to field five players with ratings 2000+ and CSC/Kingston. I understand that CSC/Kingston 1 are due to replace Wessex A in Division Three West so the Woodpushers must be firm favourites to win this Division.
Wessex A have been promoted, despite missing the 1st weekend, so let's hope they won't have a problem in whichever Div 3 they end up in
Poole and the MASCeteers go up too
Any postings on here represent my personal views
- Joey Stewart
- Posts: 1816
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:35 pm
- Location: All Of Them
- Contact:
Re: Division Four 2022-23
Kingston also proved that their early promotion was entirely justified with a commanding performance in division 3
Lose one queen and it is a disaster, Lose 1000 queens and it is just a statistic.
-
- Posts: 21183
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: Division Four 2022-23
There's only going to be one Division Three. Because of venue problems, there's going to be 24 teams in divisions 1 and 2 and 40 teams in division 3. As a result it seems likely that a number of the lower ranked teams in this season's division 4 will not be allowed to enter next season's competition.Mick Norris wrote: ↑Tue May 02, 2023 11:57 amWessex A have been promoted, despite missing the 1st weekend, so let's hope they won't have a problem in whichever Div 3 they end up in
If all teams reenter and Guildford are reinstated, that leaves only 16 slots for former division 4 teams.
-
- Posts: 8382
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Division Four 2022-23
Surely that cannot happen.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.