English Chess Forum

These are now available here.

PS Can someone tell me how to be able to write "here" instead of showing the full link?!

You write "here"

With the link included, its text, cf: here.

I'm still none the wiser. I feel a bit like Soheil and his battles with the English language. What do I actually have to do?

Mike Truran wrote:I'm still none the wiser. I feel a bit like Soheil and his battles with the English language. What do I actually have to do?

If you hit the "quote" button on Martin's post, you will see the syntax in the reply box - alternatively if you delete the spaces before and after "=" below:

[url = http://www.4ncl.co.uk/entry_guidelines.htm]here[/url]

you get

here

Many thanks Martin and Matt! And thank you too Mick for your PM.

All getting a bit techie in here?

Carl Hibbard wrote:All getting a bit techie in here?

Oooooh sought the advice and used it over there

Just practising! To be honest, I felt a bit sorry for them and thought the occasional post might cheer them up.

I'm pleased to see that there are no fewer than three users online at the moment, and that no fewer than 12 people have looked at my post since I posted over two hours ago (assuming that nobody was so shocked that someone had actually posted that they had to go back in to check).

It makes it all worthwhile.Is or more appropriate?

Mike Truran wrote:Just practising! To be honest, I felt a bit sorry for them and thought the occasional post might cheer them up.

I'm pleased to see that there are no fewer than three users online at the moment, and that no fewer than 12 people have looked at my post since I posted over two hours ago (assuming that nobody was so shocked that someone had actually posted that they had to go back in to check).

It makes it all worthwhile.Is or more appropriate?

They are probably happy with 12 so congrats.

Fourteen now. And up to four online users.

The entry deadline has now passed and I see that one Division 1 team and one Division 2 team have not re-entered according to the entry list published today. Does this mean that one Division 1 team and two Division 2 teams are reprieved from relegation?

Who knows? Something similar happened last year. In some contexts, it's called "fashionably late". But who knows

David Robertson wrote:Who knows? Something similar happened last year. In some contexts, it's called "fashionably late". But who knows

Is there a precedent for a second (third) team entering but not a first team?

Richard Bates wrote:

David Robertson wrote:Who knows? Something similar happened last year. In some contexts, it's called "fashionably late". But who knows

Is there a precedent for a second (third) team entering but not a first team?

It would be nice to know what's going on, as the latest entry list (9 Oct) no longer shows the 3rd team entry in Division 3.

Ian Thompson wrote: It would be nice to know what's going on, as the latest entry list (9 Oct) no longer shows the 3rd team entry in Division 3.

...and the fifth team has disappeared.