Page 1 of 1
Blackpool
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 3:05 pm
by LawrenceCooper
http://api.livechesscloud.com/live/a465 ... 5d9bbae601
Board 6 has four queens on the board after 13 moves, albeit I think it's a theoretical line.
Re: Blackpool
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 3:16 pm
by Roger de Coverly
LawrenceCooper wrote: albeit I think it's a theoretical line.
Around a dozen examples it seems, all won by Black. 13. .. Qa5+ (activating a queen with check) had always been preferred to 13. .. c5 (activating a bishop)
Re: Blackpool
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 3:52 pm
by Andrew Bak
Sadly I had no idea this was theory or what the theory was (although I thought my opponent knew it as he was playing quite confidently).
Re: Blackpool
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 9:31 am
by benedgell
Is there anyway to see the results/ games from previous rounds?
Re: Blackpool
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 1:43 pm
by LawrenceCooper
benedgell wrote:Is there anyway to see the results/ games from previous rounds?
I don't think so, although I expect it will appear after the event is over.
Re: Blackpool
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 5:05 pm
by David Robertson
The annihilation of David Walker by Matthew Webb was a nice way to win the tournament (jt with Keith Arkell). Walker absolutely must play 17...Bxg5 because 17...h6? 18 Nh7 (with action on f6 to come) is a known winning idea in such positions. Webb still had to retain his composure to find 23 c4!, keeping the Q-side closed, after which he turned out the lights (1-0, 25)
Re: Blackpool
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 5:10 pm
by MartinCarpenter
He's been doing that sort of thing to some awfully strong players recently

(I did briefly wonder when Walker played on with Qb5 and Webb seemed to be thinking over Qh6.....).
Keith seems to have got to 4.5 too, and they drew vs each other in round 3 (iirc) so I guess they share it?
Re: Blackpool
Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2015 8:25 am
by Clive Blackburn
David Robertson wrote:The annihilation of David Walker by Matthew Webb was a nice way to win the tournament (jt with Keith Arkell). Walker absolutely must play 17...Bxg5 because 17...h6? 18 Nh7 (with action on f6 to come) is a known winning idea in such positions. Webb still had to retain his composure to find 23 c4!, keeping the Q-side closed, after which he turned out the lights (1-0, 25)
This is the game:-
Re: Blackpool
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 1:53 pm
by Keith Arkell
David Robertson wrote:The annihilation of David Walker by Matthew Webb was a nice way to win the tournament (jt with Keith Arkell).(1-0, 25)
Nobody would believe it was the real me there, tying 1st with Matty Webb, if they looked at my games: average length 29.6 moves! About 30 less than my normal average, but was too exhausted from Dresden to do it any other way.
Re: Blackpool
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 2:00 pm
by LawrenceCooper
Keith Arkell wrote:David Robertson wrote:The annihilation of David Walker by Matthew Webb was a nice way to win the tournament (jt with Keith Arkell).(1-0, 25)
Nobody would believe it was the real me there, tying 1st with Matty Webb, if they looked at my games: average length 29.6 moves! About 30 less than my normal average, but was too exhausted from Dresden to do it any other way.
That may explain the live board operators giving you the alias "Keith Allen" in several of the games

Re: Blackpool
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 5:22 pm
by Keith Arkell
Ah yes, continuing the policy they began at the Isle of Man.
Re: Blackpool
Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2015 11:20 am
by Leonard Barden
The Guardian's comments on the Blackpool congress, published today:
http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2015/m ... ster-chess