Was Murray Chandler alone here?

Discuss anything you like about chess related matters in this forum.
User avatar
MJMcCready
Posts: 4400
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm

Was Murray Chandler alone here?

Post by MJMcCready » Wed Feb 26, 2025 2:58 pm

Yes, I know it was an exhibition game, however, who else in the 80s or 90s had the white pieces against Kasparov and then decided to move their King to f3, then to e3 in the opening with the queens still on the board and win!!!!! Can we put him down as Kasparov's most courageous opponent ever by a country mile? Who else rode their luck like that in the opening against him? Here's the game? Maybe I'm wrong but it seems like a bad idea to me to be playing the world champion and try to put your king in the centre of the board with the queens still on in the opening!!

https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessga ... 124&comp=1

Roger de Coverly
Posts: 22623
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm

Re: Was Murray Chandler alone here?

Post by Roger de Coverly » Wed Feb 26, 2025 3:16 pm

MJMcCready wrote:
Wed Feb 26, 2025 2:58 pm
Maybe I'm wrong but it seems like a bad idea to me to be playing the world champion and try to put your king in the centre of the board with the queens still on in the opening
Murray had a repuation as being well prepared with a good knowledge of theory. The line had already been played a few times by 1985.

Today engines seem to assess the position at move 13 as a little better for White.

NickFaulks
Posts: 9259
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm

Re: Was Murray Chandler alone here?

Post by NickFaulks » Wed Feb 26, 2025 3:22 pm

It remains popular at all levels, with White generally doing well. One recent example

https://old.chesstempo.com/gamedb/game/5332463/ply/25
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.

User avatar
MJMcCready
Posts: 4400
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm

Re: Was Murray Chandler alone here?

Post by MJMcCready » Wed Feb 26, 2025 5:40 pm

But to play it against Kasparov. That's brave!

User avatar
Jon Mahony
Posts: 757
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: Was Murray Chandler alone here?

Post by Jon Mahony » Wed Feb 26, 2025 5:50 pm

MJMcCready wrote:
Wed Feb 26, 2025 5:40 pm
But to play it against Kasparov. That's brave!
More like nothing to loose :) It's in the same spirit of Tony Miles upsetting Karpov with the St George (he also beat Karpov with the black pieces playing a really off-beat caro kann allowing his pawn structure to be wrecked, on another occasion). No one expects them to win, may as well go for it, try to surprise them and hope for the best.
"When you see a good move, look for a better one!" - Lasker

User avatar
Matt Mackenzie
Posts: 6348
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
Location: Millom, Cumbria

Re: Was Murray Chandler alone here?

Post by Matt Mackenzie » Wed Feb 26, 2025 6:21 pm

That line of the Caro Kann you mention (4....Nf6 5 Nf6+ gf6!?) was considered semi-respectable at the time, having been brought from obscurity by the likes of Bronstein and Larsen in the previous decade to when Miles played it in 1983. So not quite as outrageous as 1 e4 a6 really.

It does seem to be under a bit of a theoretical cloud at present, however.
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)

User avatar
MJMcCready
Posts: 4400
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm

Re: Was Murray Chandler alone here?

Post by MJMcCready » Wed Feb 26, 2025 7:46 pm

Jon Mahony wrote:
Wed Feb 26, 2025 5:50 pm
MJMcCready wrote:
Wed Feb 26, 2025 5:40 pm
But to play it against Kasparov. That's brave!
More like nothing to loose :) It's in the same spirit of Tony Miles upsetting Karpov with the St George (he also beat Karpov with the black pieces playing a really off-beat caro kann allowing his pawn structure to be wrecked, on another occasion). No one expects them to win, may as well go for it, try to surprise them and hope for the best.
Fair point but Karpov was not the only world champion whose name began with the letter K, was Russian and lost to and Englishman playing the St. Georges Defence.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpQRzMLa0PQ

NickFaulks
Posts: 9259
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm

Re: Was Murray Chandler alone here?

Post by NickFaulks » Thu Feb 27, 2025 12:12 am

MJMcCready wrote:
Wed Feb 26, 2025 5:40 pm
But to play it against Kasparov. That's brave!
I find it hard enough playing against stronger opponents without timidly avoiding moves which I believe to be best.

By your logic, the really brave move was 6.Nxc6, after which the white king is destined for f3.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.

User avatar
MJMcCready
Posts: 4400
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm

Re: Was Murray Chandler alone here?

Post by MJMcCready » Thu Feb 27, 2025 8:26 am

Yeah sure, but how many were happy to put their king on f3 in the opening against Kasparov? Not many. That's bravery to me.

NickFaulks
Posts: 9259
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm

Re: Was Murray Chandler alone here?

Post by NickFaulks » Thu Feb 27, 2025 9:38 am

Just to be clear, which alternative move do you believe Chandler might have played had he been less brave?
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.

User avatar
MJMcCready
Posts: 4400
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm

Re: Was Murray Chandler alone here?

Post by MJMcCready » Thu Feb 27, 2025 1:06 pm

Not so much the moves but the approach as a whole. What other opening lione sees white putting his king on fe and e3 in the opening. It looked like how Steiniz used to play but if it was deeemed theoretecially sound them I am, to some degree unjusitified.

But since Karpov and Kasparov lost to the St. Georges Defence. How comes we dont see it a bit more if it can topple those two?

Roger de Coverly
Posts: 22623
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm

Re: Was Murray Chandler alone here?

Post by Roger de Coverly » Thu Feb 27, 2025 1:49 pm

MJMcCready wrote:
Thu Feb 27, 2025 1:06 pm
What other opening lione sees white putting his king on fe and e3 in the opening.
There's a rare line in the Four Knights which runs



It may however be in Black's favour with correct tactical play.

User avatar
Matt Mackenzie
Posts: 6348
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
Location: Millom, Cumbria

Re: Was Murray Chandler alone here?

Post by Matt Mackenzie » Thu Feb 27, 2025 3:19 pm

The line that Chandler tried has long been considered playable despite its unusual appearance.

I doubt if Kasparov was actually that shocked by it, or indeed that it was a significant reason for his defeat.
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)

User avatar
MJMcCready
Posts: 4400
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm

Re: Was Murray Chandler alone here?

Post by MJMcCready » Thu Feb 27, 2025 3:41 pm

So in the opening we can go as far as the third rank with the king but not the forth like Tolusch once did in the Soviet Championships, which also involved sacrificing his entire queenside as well. Sorry don't have my books with me to state the year or opponent. It's well accounted for in Cafferties Soviet Chess Championships.

User avatar
Matt Mackenzie
Posts: 6348
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
Location: Millom, Cumbria

Re: Was Murray Chandler alone here?

Post by Matt Mackenzie » Thu Feb 27, 2025 3:55 pm

There is an early game of Karpov's (he was White against the gone too soon Alexander Zaitsev) where he marched his king to the actual centre of the board (d4/e4) but somehow lived to tell the tale.
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)

Post Reply