Resigning in a legally drawn position

Discuss anything you like about chess related matters in this forum.
Alexander Hardwick
Posts: 128
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 4:45 pm

Re: Resigning in a legally drawn position

Post by Alexander Hardwick » Fri Oct 29, 2010 2:41 pm

Michael Jones wrote:
Neill Cooper wrote:I used to teach juniors the 3 ways out of check (take, block, move) until I discovered the fourth when a player thought he was mated as the first 3 did not work.

[The fourth being check your opponent has not made an illegal move.]
Please bear in mind that some people on here may be short-sighted - I needed a magnifying glass to read that!
And I had to zoom the screen in 7 times before it could be read comfortably. I think that may have been the point. :D

Neill Cooper
Posts: 1398
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Cumbria
Contact:

Re: Resigning in a legally drawn position

Post by Neill Cooper » Fri Oct 29, 2010 3:53 pm

I was just using one of the 5 font size options on the format bar:
Huge Large Normal Small Tiny

User avatar
IM Jack Rudd
Posts: 5165
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:13 am
Location: Bideford
Contact:

Re: Resigning in a legally drawn position

Post by IM Jack Rudd » Fri Oct 29, 2010 4:49 pm

Neill Cooper wrote:I was just using one of the 5 font size options on the format bar:
Huge Large Normal Small Tiny
Uh, yeah. The fact that formatting options exist is not, in itself, a reason to use them. There are formatting options I'd disable if I could, underline being among them.

Alex Holowczak
Posts: 9308
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 5:18 pm
Location: Oldbury, Worcestershire
Contact:

Re: Resigning in a legally drawn position

Post by Alex Holowczak » Fri Oct 29, 2010 4:55 pm

IM Jack Rudd wrote:
Neill Cooper wrote:I was just using one of the 5 font size options on the format bar:
Huge Large Normal Small Tiny
Uh, yeah. The fact that formatting options exist is not, in itself, a reason to use them. There are formatting options I'd disable if I could, underline being among them.
Awww, don't be such a spoil sport. :wink:

Warren Kingston

Re: Resigning in a legally drawn position

Post by Warren Kingston » Fri Oct 29, 2010 5:53 pm

Jack, how about Caps in front of your name

Stewart Reuben
Posts: 4566
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:04 pm
Location: writer

Re: Resigning in a legally drawn position

Post by Stewart Reuben » Mon Nov 26, 2012 6:14 pm

I only just came across this ancient string by accident.
What happened in Chandler-Motwani was that neither was dramtically short of time and, what could possibly happen, with two such honourable players? It was tiring (and, in my case, unwise) standing in front of boards, so Kevin O'Connell and I moved from one board to another.
In the brief moment neither of us was present at the board, Murray moved his knight illegally like a bishop, forking king and rook. Murray was already the exchange up and Paul resigned instantly.
Had either Kevin or I been there we would of course have stepped in, hopefully before Paul resigned.

The Appeal Committee asked me what their rights were. I explained that they are very broad. They upheld the resignation, quite correctly, although they could have overturned it It was a relief that Paul stood so much worse.

David Sedgwick
Posts: 5252
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:56 pm
Location: Croydon
Contact:

Re: Resigning in a legally drawn position

Post by David Sedgwick » Mon Nov 26, 2012 8:00 pm

Stewart Reuben wrote:In the brief moment neither of us was present at the board, Murray moved his knight illegally like a bishop, forking king and rook. Murray was already the exchange up and Paul resigned instantly.
Memory can be fickle as to detail after 22 years.

Here is the game:



Unless I'm much mistaken, Chandler then played 30... Rxf4. Motwani resigned as he would have emerged a rook down after 31. gxf4 Rg8 - except that 30. Nxg7 is check.

MSoszynski
Posts: 317
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 4:43 pm

Re: Resigning in a legally drawn position

Post by MSoszynski » Tue Nov 27, 2012 9:08 am

Here's my eleventh-ever competitive game. My opponent resigned after the en passant, and quickly exited before anything was queried, so the result stood.

M.Soszynski-J.Cook
Hull Summer League, 1990
1.e4 e5 2.Bc4 Nf6 3.d4 d6 4.Bxf7+ Kxf7 5.dxe5 Ne8 6.Qf3+ Kg8 7.Qb3+ d5 8.e5xd6+ (ep) 1-0.

LawrenceCooper
Posts: 8661
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:13 am

Re: Resigning in a legally drawn position

Post by LawrenceCooper » Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:01 am

MSoszynski wrote:Here's my eleventh-ever competitive game. My opponent resigned after the en passant, and quickly exited before anything was queried, so the result stood.

M.Soszynski-J.Cook
Hull Summer League, 1990
1.e4 e5 2.Bc4 Nf6 3.d4 d6 4.Bxf7+ Kxf7 5.dxe5 Ne8 6.Qf3+ Kg8 7.Qb3+ d5 8.e5xd6+ (ep) 1-0.
No wonder I get so confused when playing you in simuls :lol:

Stewart Reuben
Posts: 4566
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:04 pm
Location: writer

Re: Resigning in a legally drawn position

Post by Stewart Reuben » Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:16 pm

>No wonder I get so confused when playing you in simuls<

Who givdes the simul?

Post Reply