Carlsen's ranking of world champions
-
- Posts: 8464
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Carlsen's ranking of world champions
Maybe I am prejudiced, but a genius darts player?
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
- Posts: 5235
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
- Location: Millom, Cumbria
Re: Carlsen's ranking of world champions
Yes, it can be argued a few people can be thus described.
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)
-
- Posts: 1915
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2015 2:44 pm
Re: Carlsen's ranking of world champions
I'd want to argue the case for Emanuel Lasker in the 'genius' category - basically, as a polymath. World chess champion for a record 27 years, represented Germany at international contract bridge events, eminent mathematician and philosopher, although less distinguished as a dramatist.
-
- Posts: 5235
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
- Location: Millom, Cumbria
Re: Carlsen's ranking of world champions
Even "only" his chess achievements approach genius level (isn't Carlsen quite a fan himself?)
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Carlsen's ranking of world champions
When people say "genius", what specifically are they thinking of
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 1717
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 12:15 pm
Re: Carlsen's ranking of world champions
A televised 9 dart finish aged 17JustinHorton wrote: ↑Sat May 01, 2021 8:19 pmWhen people say "genius", what specifically are they thinking of
-
- Posts: 3191
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: Carlsen's ranking of world champions
MVG almost got two in a row once, missing out on the double 12 to finish them off.
-
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 6:33 pm
Re: Carlsen's ranking of world champions
I think Justin's question deserves a serious answer.
Without consulting a dictionary, I define genius as immense natural talent. It normally manifests itself early, like Mozart's music for example.
When genius is allied with monomania and an immense capacity for hard work, you get a player like Fischer!
Without consulting a dictionary, I define genius as immense natural talent. It normally manifests itself early, like Mozart's music for example.
When genius is allied with monomania and an immense capacity for hard work, you get a player like Fischer!
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Carlsen's ranking of world champions
But does this mean anything? Do we have a scientific basis for it?
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 6:33 pm
Re: Carlsen's ranking of world champions
No scientific basis at all.
I didn't think you would like my answer; but at least you got one!
I didn't think you would like my answer; but at least you got one!
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Carlsen's ranking of world champions
No, it's OK! I mean personally I find the idea quite attractive, some kind of innate ability that most of us don't possess, explaining why some people not only develop extraordinary capacities to do this or that, but in such a way as to seem both natural and idiosyncratic, like this is them, it can't entirely be taught. But we don't seem to have a scientific basis for it.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 6:33 pm
Re: Carlsen's ranking of world champions
Cannot we all accept on this forum - with the possible exception of Nigel Short, who posts here occasionally - that Bobby Fischer had an innate ability that the rest of us don't possess?
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Carlsen's ranking of world champions
No, I wouldn't have thought we could.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 1523
- Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2016 4:15 pm
Re: Carlsen's ranking of world champions
That seems correct. This is the internet where substantial numbers of people argue the earth is flat.
I'd agree Fischer had an aptitude for chess far greater than most people. Genius, I'm not sure.
If a darts player can be a genius, then certainly Fischer was. But it seems to me that the requirement for originality and creative a bit less clear, if I look at how genius defined here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genius. I think the received opinion of Fischer now is that he was of the sportsman type, like Lasker, Karpov and Carlsen, a person primarily motivated by winning. For me genius sits easier with the artists, even if their results not as consistent.
I'd agree Fischer had an aptitude for chess far greater than most people. Genius, I'm not sure.
If a darts player can be a genius, then certainly Fischer was. But it seems to me that the requirement for originality and creative a bit less clear, if I look at how genius defined here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genius. I think the received opinion of Fischer now is that he was of the sportsman type, like Lasker, Karpov and Carlsen, a person primarily motivated by winning. For me genius sits easier with the artists, even if their results not as consistent.
-
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 6:33 pm
Re: Carlsen's ranking of world champions
Interesting point, Paul.
At Cambridge I had a passing acquaintance with Richard Borcherds, one of the most talented people at the university.
He had been a promising player as a junior, but gave chess up, I suspect because he disliked the sporting element.
At Cambridge I had a passing acquaintance with Richard Borcherds, one of the most talented people at the university.
He had been a promising player as a junior, but gave chess up, I suspect because he disliked the sporting element.