Emma Raducanu’s results

Discuss anything you like about chess related matters in this forum.
Alan Atkinson
Posts: 32
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2016 7:08 pm

Emma Raducanu’s results

Post by Alan Atkinson » Sun Sep 12, 2021 7:24 am

So if I were to push Emma Raducanu’s tennis results through the FIDE fair play system, or similar, would it be determined that she must be cheating somehow, and would she then get banned from the activity?

Matthew Turner
Posts: 3600
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 11:54 am

Re: Emma Raducanu’s results

Post by Matthew Turner » Sun Sep 12, 2021 8:05 am

Is Raducanu's performance more remarkable than Freddy Gordon's? I would suggest from a statistical standpoint, no. Freddy has competed in the Scottish Championships, the British Championships, ECU events and recently the Olympiad, has he ever been banned, no. Does that answer your question?

Anyway, congratulations to both players for some remarkable results - sports fans everywhere are very excited at seeing a lot more in the years to come.
Last edited by Matthew Turner on Sun Sep 12, 2021 8:29 am, edited 1 time in total.

Paul Habershon
Posts: 550
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 5:51 pm

Re: Emma Raducanu’s results

Post by Paul Habershon » Sun Sep 12, 2021 8:24 am

Alan Atkinson wrote:
Sun Sep 12, 2021 7:24 am
So if I were to push Emma Raducanu’s tennis results through the FIDE fair play system, or similar, would it be determined that she must be cheating somehow, and would she then get banned from the activity?
I do get the irony, Alan, but apart from gamesmanship (e.g. delaying tactics, unwarranted medical timeouts, lengthy toilet breaks etc.) it is difficult to cheat at tennis. There have indeed been doping incidents (Hingis, Sharapova, Dan Evans), but often because of cocaine use, which I think would scarcely improve quality of shotmaking or even stamina. Serena Williams got into trouble for not being available for testing.

Park social players can cheat with wrong line calls, but Hawkeye has eliminated all the McEnroe-type shenanigans from the professional game. I did not see line judges at the US Open final. Were there any? Had technology completely taken over?

Tennis, unlike chess, does not adapt well to online play infected by cheating, though I remember one of the earliest pub video games was a crude form of batting a ball to and fro.
Last edited by Paul Habershon on Sun Sep 12, 2021 9:36 am, edited 1 time in total.

MSoszynski
Posts: 262
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 4:43 pm

Re: Emma Raducanu’s results

Post by MSoszynski » Sun Sep 12, 2021 8:41 am

Consider that Raducanu was ranked 150th in the world, and her opponent in the final 73rd (wtatennis.com). Now, for a chess comparision, look at those rankings and those players' respective ratings on the FIDE list.

User avatar
IM Jack Rudd
Posts: 4815
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:13 am
Location: Bideford
Contact:

Re: Emma Raducanu’s results

Post by IM Jack Rudd » Sun Sep 12, 2021 5:34 pm

A quick glance suggests that's a rating gap of about 30-40 points, and nobody is going to be particularly interested in that as a giant-killing.

Alan Atkinson
Posts: 32
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2016 7:08 pm

Re: Emma Raducanu’s results

Post by Alan Atkinson » Sun Sep 12, 2021 6:16 pm

Well, it's a little more than 30-40 points, but I was initially considering a player who, a couple of months ago was ranked over 300th, and yet has won one of the top elite events without dropping a set to anybody.

And of course, it is excellent that a couple of new young players seem to have appeared, and their individual match was entertaining and all.

Was just amused by considering how such an overall outcome might be considered in chess circles.

Joseph Conlon
Posts: 339
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2019 4:18 pm

Re: Emma Raducanu’s results

Post by Joseph Conlon » Sun Sep 12, 2021 8:33 pm

Would an analogy be if a player rated 1800 or so won (say, Praggnananddhaa) a major rapid championship?

User avatar
Matt Mackenzie
Posts: 5191
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
Location: Millom, Cumbria

Re: Emma Raducanu’s results

Post by Matt Mackenzie » Sun Sep 12, 2021 9:13 pm

Yes, but we all know that isn't his "real" rapid rating.
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)

Joseph Conlon
Posts: 339
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2019 4:18 pm

Re: Emma Raducanu’s results

Post by Joseph Conlon » Sun Sep 12, 2021 9:22 pm

Matt Mackenzie wrote:
Sun Sep 12, 2021 9:13 pm
Yes, but we all know that isn't his "real" rapid rating.
But no more than 150 or 300 was the 'real' rating of Raducanu given she hadn't competed for 18 months or so because of Covid disruptions...

Matt Bridgeman
Posts: 1077
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 9:21 pm

Re: Emma Raducanu’s results

Post by Matt Bridgeman » Sun Sep 12, 2021 9:33 pm

I’m trying to think of similar breakthroughs. Justin Rose would be one in golf, being a 17 year old amateur coming out of nowhere to finish 4th equal in The Open. Certainly tennis and golf are popular with the media. I’m sure Emma will not be too short of fame and fortune.

Matthew Turner
Posts: 3600
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 11:54 am

Re: Emma Raducanu’s results

Post by Matthew Turner » Sun Sep 12, 2021 9:51 pm

Van Foreest Tata Steel

User avatar
Matt Mackenzie
Posts: 5191
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
Location: Millom, Cumbria

Re: Emma Raducanu’s results

Post by Matt Mackenzie » Sun Sep 12, 2021 9:56 pm

Hardly unknown before that, though.

If we are delving back into history, Gazza at Banja Luka 1979 has to be a pretty good one.
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)

User avatar
JustinHorton
Posts: 10364
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
Location: Somewhere you're not

Re: Emma Raducanu’s results

Post by JustinHorton » Mon Sep 13, 2021 8:37 am

Also, are we talking about breakthroughs, or extremely surprising wins by young and/or unknown outsiders
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."

lostontime.blogspot.com

User avatar
Chris Goodall
Posts: 1057
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 6:40 pm
Contact:

Re: Emma Raducanu’s results

Post by Chris Goodall » Mon Sep 13, 2021 10:48 am

Winning a Slam under any circumstances is an incredible feat. Even when you're the top seed, 7 chances to get knocked out is a lot. I have Raducanu-mania!

Still. If there was one player at the US Open for whom the stars aligned, it was our Emma. She's now the world #23, and if you assume she didn't get better at tennis over the course of the tournament, that means she was about the 23rd best at tennis at the start of the tournament too.

She played the world numbers 283, 173, 158, 121, 49, 41, 43, 11, 18 and 73. Beating Belinda Bencic at 11 was her giantest killing.

Her final opponent Fernandez knocked out seeds 2, 3, and 5, plus a former world #1, all in three sets including a tiebreak. In the final Fernandez hit the wall, and landed only 56% of her first serves.

Emma's last four opponents had all just cleared a more dangerous adversary out of her way, and then found themselves facing this girl with Q next to her name. Time to relax! Her semi-final opponent knocked out 4, 6 and 10; her quarter-final opponent knocked out 7; her fourth round opponent knocked out 1.

So if I was on the fair play committee, I would conclude that there was nothing suspicious about Raducanu's victory, but that the women's world rankings are currently garbage and need recalibrating to account for the pandemic's effects on training and competition.
Donate to Sabrina's fundraiser at https://gofund.me/aeae42c7 to support victims of sexual abuse in the chess world.

Northumberland webmaster, Jesmond CC something-or-other. Views mine. Definitely below the Goodall Line.

User avatar
Christopher Kreuzer
Posts: 8781
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
Location: London

Re: Emma Raducanu’s results

Post by Christopher Kreuzer » Mon Sep 13, 2021 11:13 am

The British public (well, those voting at the BBC) currently agree (43%):

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/tennis/58534133

Her victory is compared to 9 other great British sporting triumphs in sports from athletics to netball, hockey, rugby union, cricket, tennis and football. I voted for Andy Murray's first Wimbledon win, with the Rugby World Cup in 2003 a close second and Raducanu's win definitely in my top three or four. If England had won in the Euro 2020 final, I might have gone for that. 1966 feels too long ago now (need to have personally witnessed something to vote for it).

PS. Agree with this: "[tennis] world rankings are [not as accurate as they could be] and need recalibrating to account for the pandemic's effects on training and competition." It is interesting to note that Raducanu as well as playing in the Girls' Singles at Wimbledon earlier in her career, also entered qualifying for Wimbledon in 2018 and 2019, so she was clearly good then as well, so not entirely surprising that she broke through in her teenage years, much like Graf, Hingis, Seles, the Williams sisters, and a host of other female players (this is more common for women than men). A male qualifier winning a Grand Slam title would be harder in my opinion, but several unseeded players have won Grand Slams.

Post Reply