As well as initiatives to obtain TV and other coverage and more local press coverage on the lines of Ernie Lazenby's reporting, I would like to see steps taken to improve the standard of arbiting and playing conditions in tournaments. There is little point in advertising a product if that product is flawed.cjdemooi wrote:It's gone very quiet on here since I asked if anyone had any positive suggestions. I've had a couple of people insult me via Facebook then run away but that's hardly constructive either. Has no-one anything he or she would like to offer?
Arbiters, who get the most basic things wrong, such as interfering when they see a flag fall in a rapid event as recently stated on this forum and also not intervening when required for example on a flag fall in a LP event or after an external disturbance, should be recognised as poor arbiters and sent for retraining or retired. Some players just wont return to poorly run events. A few more arbiter quizes on the website would assist both arbiters and players to understand the rules.
Regarding improving playing conditions, by that I mean equipment, space available, refreshment areas etc., maybe the ECF could have the equivalent of a kite-mark known as ECF approval which is only given to those Tournaments which met the standards when held the previous year and undertake to meet various criteria at the next event. Using the "ECF approval" on a tournament entry form or website should encourage additional entries. In addition requiring arbiters names to be on entry forms would enable players to select the best tournaments and encourage the rest to improve as players vote with their feet.