FIDE Article 6.9 Application

Discuss anything you like about chess related matters in this forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
Arnav Sud
Posts: 66
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2022 7:47 pm

FIDE Article 6.9 Application

Post by Arnav Sud » Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:57 pm

Taken from here: https://lichess.org/OawUhnkq


According to LiChess, when Black ran out of time in this game White got the point. However, according to FIDE it should've been a draw as after
1. g7+ Kg8
2. gxR=Q/R K/QxQ/R White cannot mate.
Underpromotion doesn't work too.

Any thoughts from any arbiters?! :)
Club Secretary - Bristol Four Knights
https://lms.englishchess.org.uk/lms/organisation/503?

User avatar
IM Jack Rudd
Posts: 5165
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:13 am
Location: Bideford
Contact:

Re: FIDE Article 6.9 Application

Post by IM Jack Rudd » Mon Jul 18, 2022 2:30 pm

Yes, this is a known point where chess server rules don't quite match up with FIDE rules.

David Sedgwick
Posts: 5252
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:56 pm
Location: Croydon
Contact:

Re: FIDE Article 6.9 Application

Post by David Sedgwick » Mon Jul 18, 2022 2:30 pm

Arnav Sud wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:57 pm
Any thoughts from any arbiters?! :)
It's well known that Lichess and Chess.com get this sort of thing wrong.

In an official event like the Online Olympiad the arbiter should intervene to declare the game drawn.

Joseph Conlon
Posts: 347
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2019 4:18 pm

Re: FIDE Article 6.9 Application

Post by Joseph Conlon » Mon Jul 18, 2022 2:33 pm

David Sedgwick wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 2:30 pm
Arnav Sud wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 1:57 pm
Any thoughts from any arbiters?! :)
It's well known that Lichess and Chess.com get this sort of thing wrong.

In an official event like the Online Olympiad the arbiter should intervene to declare the game drawn.
I'm not sure 'get this wrong' is quite fair; the servers are quite open that their rules for evaluating this sort of position don't accord with FIDE rules, because of the high overhead of asking 'can mate be constructed?' on the final position as 'dead' positions are hard for engines to tell.

Kevin Thurlow
Posts: 6629
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm

Re: FIDE Article 6.9 Application

Post by Kevin Thurlow » Mon Jul 18, 2022 4:19 pm


David Sedgwick
Posts: 5252
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:56 pm
Location: Croydon
Contact:

Re: FIDE Article 6.9 Application

Post by David Sedgwick » Mon Jul 18, 2022 4:37 pm

Kevin Thurlow wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 4:19 pm
Eric Rosen raised a similar issue

https://twitter.com/IM_Rosen/status/1540319048696795138
In response, I made the same point on Twitter that I have made today on here.

NickFaulks
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm

Re: FIDE Article 6.9 Application

Post by NickFaulks » Mon Jul 18, 2022 4:43 pm

Joseph Conlon wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 2:33 pm
I'm not sure 'get this wrong' is quite fair; the servers are quite open that their rules for evaluating this sort of position don't accord with FIDE rules
ie when they are being used in games played under the FIDE Laws of Chess, they get these positions wrong. I don't think they are being criticised for that, and if a miniscule number of cases require manual intervention by an arbiter, I don't see that as a major problem.

It does require the arbiters to know what they are doing.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.

Geoff Chandler
Posts: 3815
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 1:36 pm
Location: Under Cover
Contact:

Re: FIDE Article 6.9 Application

Post by Geoff Chandler » Mon Jul 18, 2022 4:56 pm

I have heard about Eric's situation before.

It was something like this.



1. Rxh2+ Bxh2 game stopped and declared a draw by the onsite computer. White has mate in one.

User avatar
Joey Stewart
Posts: 2172
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:35 pm
Location: All Of Them
Contact:

Re: FIDE Article 6.9 Application

Post by Joey Stewart » Mon Jul 18, 2022 8:39 pm

It should be an option to appeal results online in and if the engine says yes it is a forced win/draw then the loss on time gets instantly corrected to the right result- I once had a guy play nearly 200 moves in a dead drawn opposite bishop endgame once in desperation to win on time, so anything that ruins results for idiots like that would get a big thumbs up from me!
Any opinions expressed will not be held to account.

User avatar
MJMcCready
Posts: 4393
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm

Re: FIDE Article 6.9 Application

Post by MJMcCready » Mon Jul 18, 2022 10:19 pm

Geoff Chandler wrote:
Mon Jul 18, 2022 4:56 pm
I have heard about Eric's situation before.

It was something like this.



1. Rxh2+ Bxh2 game stopped and declared a draw by the onsite computer. White has mate in one.
Was it a computer from the 70s?

Post Reply