Nakamura beats Carlsen 3-1 at blitz
-
- Posts: 1735
- Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 3:10 pm
- Location: Kingston-upon-Thames
Nakamura beats Carlsen 3-1 at blitz
Hikaru Nakamura's 3-1 blitz victory over Magnus Carlsen in the BNbank Blitz tournament in Oslo (28 Nov) has had the effect of retrospectively devaluing the recent World Blitz Championship held in Moscow. Why didn't Hikaru play in Moscow? Anyone happen to know?
Personal Twitter @johnchess
Britbase https://www.britbase.info
(I prefer email to PM - contact me via this link - https://www.saund.org.uk/email.html)
Britbase https://www.britbase.info
(I prefer email to PM - contact me via this link - https://www.saund.org.uk/email.html)
-
- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:05 pm
- Location: Evesham
Re: Nakamura beats Carlsen 3-1 at blitz
Mig commented that his invitation was a little late here:John Saunders wrote:Hikaru Nakamura's 3-1 blitz victory over Magnus Carlsen in the BNbank Blitz tournament in Oslo (28 Nov) has had the effect of retrospectively devaluing the recent World Blitz Championship held in Moscow. Why didn't Hikaru play in Moscow? Anyone happen to know?
http://www.chessninja.com/dailydirt/200 ... moscow.htm
Cheers
Carl Hibbard
Carl Hibbard
-
- Posts: 1735
- Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 3:10 pm
- Location: Kingston-upon-Thames
Re: Nakamura beats Carlsen 3-1 at blitz
Thanks, Carl, that's very useful. EC Forum is getting almost too good. I don't need to google any more - just ask a question here and one of you guys shoots back an answer!
Nakamura's Oslo success against Carlsen is a refutation of the notion I've seen bandied about on the web (not here) that he is only any good at online blitz and finds fast chess on a three-dimensional board more of a problem.
Nakamura's Oslo success against Carlsen is a refutation of the notion I've seen bandied about on the web (not here) that he is only any good at online blitz and finds fast chess on a three-dimensional board more of a problem.
Personal Twitter @johnchess
Britbase https://www.britbase.info
(I prefer email to PM - contact me via this link - https://www.saund.org.uk/email.html)
Britbase https://www.britbase.info
(I prefer email to PM - contact me via this link - https://www.saund.org.uk/email.html)
-
- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:05 pm
- Location: Evesham
Re: Nakamura beats Carlsen 3-1 at blitz
We shall find out soon in London won't we!John Saunders wrote:Nakamura's Oslo success against Carlsen is a refutation of the notion I've seen bandied about on the web (not here) that he is only any good at online blitz and finds fast chess on a three-dimensional board more of a problem.
The three points for a win should make quite a difference in that one I think
Cheers
Carl Hibbard
Carl Hibbard
-
- Posts: 21350
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: Nakamura beats Carlsen 3-1 at blitz
In practice in these small events with players of near equal ability, the 3 1 0 system just acts as a tie-breaker. With 7 games, +3 =4 is probably first place but would lose out on tie break to +4 -1 =2. As regards stopping draws, it would be an incentive to draw that if you couldn't expect to score 3 points yourself, you could at least stop your rival doing so.Carl Hibbard wrote:
The three points for a win should make quite a difference in that one I think
Over an odd number of games, the 3 1 0 system seems to favour the players with more whites, so that if you score +3 with your whites and =4 with your blacks, you lose out to a player who scores +4 with his whites and -1 =2 with his blacks.
-
- Posts: 1735
- Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 3:10 pm
- Location: Kingston-upon-Thames
Re: Nakamura beats Carlsen 3-1 at blitz
I was only talking about the difference between HN playing fast (i.e. blitz or bullet) chess on a conventional board compared to online. The London tournament is standard-play and there is all the difference in the world. Hikaru has knocked on the head the notion that he only wins online because he is the fastest mouse in the West.Carl Hibbard wrote:We shall find out soon in London won't we!John Saunders wrote:Nakamura's Oslo success against Carlsen is a refutation of the notion I've seen bandied about on the web (not here) that he is only any good at online blitz and finds fast chess on a three-dimensional board more of a problem.
The three points for a win should make quite a difference in that one I think
Personal Twitter @johnchess
Britbase https://www.britbase.info
(I prefer email to PM - contact me via this link - https://www.saund.org.uk/email.html)
Britbase https://www.britbase.info
(I prefer email to PM - contact me via this link - https://www.saund.org.uk/email.html)
-
- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:05 pm
- Location: Evesham
Re: Nakamura beats Carlsen 3-1 at blitz
Ah I see, sorry - too many active windows and not enough thought applied at this endJohn Saunders wrote:I was only talking about the difference between HN playing fast (i.e. blitz or bullet) chess on a conventional board compared to online. The London tournament is standard-play and there is all the difference in the world. Hikaru has knocked on the head the notion that he only wins online because he is the fastest mouse in the West.
Cheers
Carl Hibbard
Carl Hibbard
-
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 12:26 pm
Re: Nakamura beats Carlsen 3-1 at blitz
I don't think there's any doubt whatsoever that Nakamura is one of the worlds best blitz players, online and offline. It's a great shame he couldn't take part in the World Blitz Champs; most likely he would have finished top five, perhaps even have won it. Considering his Elo rating plus his well-known ability at blitz and quicker forms of chess, it must be inferred that either everyone was invited equally late, or, that he initially and unexplicably was overlooked.John Saunders wrote:Thanks, Carl, that's very useful. EC Forum is getting almost too good. I don't need to google any more - just ask a question here and one of you guys shoots back an answer!
Nakamura's Oslo success against Carlsen is a refutation of the notion I've seen bandied about on the web (not here) that he is only any good at online blitz and finds fast chess on a three-dimensional board more of a problem.
-
- Posts: 246
- Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 10:53 pm
Re: Nakamura beats Carlsen 3-1 at blitz
I agree. I think it was Stuart Reuben that suggested a small modification that gives one point to white for a draw, but two points to black. I quite like that suggestion. I think it was even implemented in some tournament somewhere, but not sure where.Roger de Coverly wrote:Over an odd number of games, the 3 1 0 system seems to favour the players with more whites.
It seems right that black should get something more for a draw than white.
Chess Amateur.
-
- Posts: 517
- Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 5:21 pm
- Location: Cambridge
Re: Nakamura beats Carlsen 3-1 at blitz
There are videos of each of the games from the final at http://www.youtube.com/user/toddfreitag and http://www.youtube.com/user/MrGaarder
The first set give you a clearer view of the board but are very choppy in places. The second set seem quite smooth and show you more of the players so you can see body language etc.. There's an interesting moment towards the end of game 2 when Carlsen realises that Naka is promoting with check, and throws his hands down at his side in anger. Understandable given that he was much better earlier in the game.
The first set give you a clearer view of the board but are very choppy in places. The second set seem quite smooth and show you more of the players so you can see body language etc.. There's an interesting moment towards the end of game 2 when Carlsen realises that Naka is promoting with check, and throws his hands down at his side in anger. Understandable given that he was much better earlier in the game.
-
- Posts: 5264
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
- Location: Millom, Cumbria
Re: Nakamura beats Carlsen 3-1 at blitz
A tad understated there, I feel - it was, without any exaggeration whatever, a position from which Magnus would have won 999 times out of every 1,000. Small wonder he went on to lose the match, really..........Eoin Devane wrote:Understandable given that he was much better earlier in the game
And I am frankly surprised at JS's suggestion that this result "devalues" Carlsen's fabulous win in the World Blitz tourney. IMO it does absolutely nothing of the sort
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)
-
- Posts: 1735
- Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 3:10 pm
- Location: Kingston-upon-Thames
Re: Nakamura beats Carlsen 3-1 at blitz
It devalues it, not because Nakamura has "proved" he is better than Carlsen (because he hasn't) but because Nakamura has proved he should have been in the line-up in Moscow, given that it was billed as the 'world blitz championship'. He should have been a contender!Matt Mackenzie wrote:A tad understated there, I feel - it was, without any exaggeration whatever, a position from which Magnus would have won 999 times out of every 1,000. Small wonder he went on to lose the match, really..........Eoin Devane wrote:Understandable given that he was much better earlier in the game
And I am frankly surprised at JS's suggestion that this result "devalues" Carlsen's fabulous win in the World Blitz tourney. IMO it does absolutely nothing of the sort
Personal Twitter @johnchess
Britbase https://www.britbase.info
(I prefer email to PM - contact me via this link - https://www.saund.org.uk/email.html)
Britbase https://www.britbase.info
(I prefer email to PM - contact me via this link - https://www.saund.org.uk/email.html)
-
- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:05 pm
- Location: Evesham
Re: Nakamura beats Carlsen 3-1 at blitz
His latest blog comments that he did not receive an invite??John Saunders wrote:It devalues it, not because Nakamura has "proved" he is better than Carlsen (because he hasn't) but because Nakamura has proved he should have been in the line-up in Moscow, given that it was billed as the 'world blitz championship'. He should have been a contender!
Here:
http://www.hikarunakamura.com/main/Blog ... Recap.aspx
Cheers
Carl Hibbard
Carl Hibbard