Page 1 of 1
Tennison gambit
Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2023 1:39 pm
by Francesco Santelli
I wonder whether there is anybody that can explain what Otto M. Tennison intended or alluded to when proposing to name his gambit “Black Rook’s Gambit”. Thanks for your attention. All the best, Francesco
Re: Tennison gambit
Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2023 3:16 pm
by Matt Mackenzie
For those who don't know, the opening in question goes 1 Nf3 d5 2 e4 - or alternately 1 e4 d5 2 Nf3.
International News section, though?

Re: Tennison gambit
Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2023 4:05 pm
by Carl Hibbard
Matt Mackenzie wrote: ↑Tue Jun 20, 2023 3:16 pm
International News section, though?
Not now.
Re: Tennison gambit
Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2023 7:03 pm
by Jon D'Souza-Eva
This is the game included in Otto Tennison's letter to the Chess Editor of the Times-Democrat (New Orleans) newspaper in 1891:
See
https://imgbox.com/nZc6Osbl
Of course none of this actually explains what "Black Rook's Gambit" alludes to!
Re: Tennison gambit
Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2023 1:18 pm
by Paul Cooksey
I try not to criticise the standard of play of games in the chess history section, because I know that is not the point.
But since this is in general chat...good grief, I think that is amongst the worst games I have ever seen.
Re: Tennison gambit
Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2023 4:50 pm
by Geoff Chandler
I was reading Otto's page at chessgames.com;
https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessplayer?pid=99715
He fought for both the Union and the Confederates in the Civil War and at one time was under sentence of death. Doubt we will ever find out why he called it the Black Rook Gambit.
Here instead of 6..Kd7 Black play 6...g6 7.Qxg6+ Rf7
That is a unique Black Rook! (I cannot recall a Rook doing that before.)
I googled 'Black Rook + chess' and found a Chess Rook Puzzle. You have to open it and find the coin.
https://cruxpuzzles.co.uk/product/chess ... zle-black/
Re: Tennison gambit
Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2023 5:55 pm
by Jon D'Souza-Eva
Never mind about the hidden coin, if I bought that puzzle I'd be more concerned about the lost £25.95.
I thought the Tennison game was OK and I've seen many far worse, though that's perhaps not unrelated to the number of times I've been the controller of the bottom section of a tournament.
Re: Tennison gambit
Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2023 6:09 pm
by Matt Mackenzie
Was a bit surprised Black resigned that early tbh, they *are* lost but I suspect most would have made White play it out for a few more moves.
Re: Tennison gambit
Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2023 6:29 pm
by Roger de Coverly
Geoff Chandler wrote: ↑Wed Jun 21, 2023 4:50 pm
That is a unique Black Rook! (I cannot recall a Rook doing that before.)
You may have miised Danny Gormally v Simon Williams from the 2006 EU Championship in Liverpool.
Re: Tennison gambit
Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2023 7:57 pm
by Nick Ivell
What a game. No wonder Danny describes the mid Noughties as his golden period.
Re: Tennison gambit
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2023 10:41 am
by Geoff Chandler
Roger de Coverly wrote: ↑Wed Jun 21, 2023 6:29 pm
You may have miised Danny Gormally v Simon Williams from the 2006 EU Championship in Liverpool.
A good spot Roger, yes the Rook on f7 in the Schoolboy pattern.
The Black Rook.
This is a very big if...Maybe it was a topical play on words referring to a musical '
The Black Crook' which was famous (or infamous ) around about then due to the fact it had 'Beautiful bare-legged girls...' and a review suggesting due to the indecency of the costumes and dancing it should have been called 'Sodom and Gomorrah' (I hope they run this one at the coming Edinburgh Festival.)
Mark Twain liked it, Dickens not so, but it was famous.'Both awe and outrage fueled the show's increasing popularity until "nobody could hold his own in conversation unless he had seen it" state it's own wiki-page
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Black_Crook
The follow up play was called, and I'm not making thus up;
The White Fawn
Of course I'm most likely way off but a good thread. Finding about Tennison and the Civil War and The Black Crook.
It also brought back memories of gaffe No.607 (I keep a count of these things.) I once added a note to a dubious pawn sacrifice. 'I fired a pawn into the air...where it landed I know not where.' and then cited an apology to Tennyson. Only to be told a few days later that it was Longfellow.
Re: Tennison gambit
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2025 6:23 pm
by IM Jack Rudd
I faced the Tennison Gambit yesterday:
I was dimly wondering how I managed to get an advantage so easily, when I don't find the Blumenfeld Gambit that easy to meet. And, of course, it's the "extra move's gonna hurt me" thing. If I try 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e5 3.dxe5 Ng4 4.Nf3 Nc6 5.Bg5, black can just play 5...Be7 6.Bf4 Bb4+ and transpose into one of the main lines. The equivalent line isn't great for white here, because I still have ...c6.
Re: Tennison gambit
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2025 7:15 pm
by Roger de Coverly
IM Jack Rudd wrote: ↑Sat Apr 12, 2025 6:23 pm
I was dimly wondering how I managed to get an advantage so easily
It was suggested to me recently that for an opponent who might be taken outside their comfort zone that the Scandinavian version might be worth a punt. That is to introduce it by 1. e4 d5 2. Nf3 rather than from a Reti.