Page 1 of 1
Re: Blackpool congress 2010
Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:52 pm
by Sean Hewitt
well, it's not fide rated for a start. that will put a number of people off.
Re: Blackpool congress 2010
Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:15 pm
by Matt Mackenzie
Having said that, quite a lot of stronger players tend to enter late from what I recall.........
(says he, yet to post his entry off!

)
Re: Blackpool congress 2010
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 8:38 am
by Carl Hibbard
Ernie Lazenby wrote:The admin team/arbiters did a fantastic job and deserve our congratulations.
Thanks also go to Dave Clayton for a perfect live broadcast, good work there

Re: Blackpool congress 2010
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 1:07 pm
by Matt Mackenzie
Would like to endorse the positive things said about the congress, venue etc........
Just one small thing - prize giving at the end was done away with this year (posted them off instead) and apparently this is going to remain the policy.
Wouldn't it though be possible to just have a small closing announcement?
Re: Blackpool congress 2010
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 1:12 pm
by Justin Hadi
I agree with the above posters. Dave Welch and the team of arbiters did an excellent job with no big disputes in the whole tournament IIRC. Quite rare in my experience.
Re: Blackpool congress 2010
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 7:05 pm
by Matt Mackenzie
Justin Hadi wrote:I agree with the above posters. Dave Welch and the team of arbiters did an excellent job with no big disputes in the whole tournament IIRC. Quite rare in my experience.
That's true - as you know there was a minor incident early on in our game but he sorted it with a minimum of fuss
Oh and BTW - I have Fritzed the final position and after 36. ab5 (there is nothing better) Bb5, it gives black a decisive advantage; about one and a half pawns. I said at the time I thought your draw offer was a tad generous

Re: Blackpool congress 2010
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 8:24 pm
by Justin Hadi
Bummer. I really should book up on my endings. I was planning on playing ab after ab5 because I couldn't see anything better.
Re: Blackpool congress 2010
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 8:47 pm
by Justin Hadi
But I am reminded of this quote - My first chess trainer ... was of the opinion that you only had a winning position if you knew how to win it. If it required Karpov-like technique, the position was winning for Karpov, but only advantageous for me.
Re: Blackpool congress 2010
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 8:55 pm
by Anthony Taglione
I tend to think that a player is doing the right thing when he offers a draw, whatever analysis later reveals.
Good, point, Justin. Tal might be a queen down with a mating attack but most people would be just a queen down.
Re: Blackpool congress 2010
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 9:04 pm
by Matt Mackenzie
All fair comment - I have done the same myself in the past, don't worry Justin
(though lately, more of a problem has been my turning down draws and going on to lose!

)
Re: Blackpool congress 2010
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 9:39 pm
by NeilJerzynek
it had to leave it's 2nd last venue (last year was at football ground which didn't work)
There were at least 2 above 200 (gm's) hebden and stewart hestlinger (can't remember exactly what his second name is)
Re: Blackpool congress 2010
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 9:49 pm
by Alex Holowczak
NeilJerzynek wrote: stewart hestlinger (can't remember exactly what his second name is)
Haslinger

Re: Blackpool congress 2010
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:08 pm
by Matt Mackenzie
NeilJerzynek wrote:it had to leave it's 2nd last venue (last year was at football ground which didn't work)
I didn't think it was a bad venue myself - what was the problem with it??