World Championship 2010
Re: World Championship 2010
Which player would be the stronger in a Rapidplay play-off? Would Topalov's more creative style of play allow him to confuse Anand, or would Anand's adaptability be able to serve him well when there's less time to think? By now I'm sure Anand has taken heart in knowing some of his drawn games could have been won for himself and while the results aren't on the table that's sure to boost his confidence if he can stay just that little bit sharper.
-
- Posts: 4662
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:26 pm
Re: World Championship 2010
True, there is no good opening to play for a win for black at this level. I had said the Slav earlier in memory of what Anand did to Kramnik, bu it's true that nothing could give remoter winning chances than the Slav line which he is favouring against Topalov.
This suggests to me that Anand will be realistic and just choose the safest draw - that still points towards the Slav, on the run of play so far.
I am just saying that he wants a draw on principle, because he is Black. I am not sure how much of a favourite he would be in rapidplay. Sure, he is generally much better at rapidplay than Topalov, but so too was he always better than Kamsky and Karpov at rapidplay and he lost matches to them on rapid play tie breaks in the 1990s. And Topalov actually played much better than his usual rapidplay level against Kramnik, even though he still lost.
It's difficult. As Mig says, "Anand better, Topalov tougher!"
This suggests to me that Anand will be realistic and just choose the safest draw - that still points towards the Slav, on the run of play so far.
I am just saying that he wants a draw on principle, because he is Black. I am not sure how much of a favourite he would be in rapidplay. Sure, he is generally much better at rapidplay than Topalov, but so too was he always better than Kamsky and Karpov at rapidplay and he lost matches to them on rapid play tie breaks in the 1990s. And Topalov actually played much better than his usual rapidplay level against Kramnik, even though he still lost.
It's difficult. As Mig says, "Anand better, Topalov tougher!"
-
- Posts: 382
- Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 7:11 pm
Re: World Championship 2010
I'm going to stick my neck out and say Nimzo/Queens Indian from Anand tomorrow.
I'm not sure if his switch back to the Grunfeld in G10 was a result of him being progressively more uncomfortable in these Slav endings or something else, but his fairly risky attempt to win G11 near the end suggests that he isn't all that happy with having to decide this thing in tie-breaks.
A Nimzo is solid, yet would keep enough in the position to allow him to play if Topalov decides to go for it.
Jonathan's probably right though and we will see another Slav!
I'm not sure if his switch back to the Grunfeld in G10 was a result of him being progressively more uncomfortable in these Slav endings or something else, but his fairly risky attempt to win G11 near the end suggests that he isn't all that happy with having to decide this thing in tie-breaks.
A Nimzo is solid, yet would keep enough in the position to allow him to play if Topalov decides to go for it.
Jonathan's probably right though and we will see another Slav!
-
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 2:07 pm
- Location: South London
Re: World Championship 2010
Queen's Gambit Accepted, win for Topalov.
(Btw, can't black still play for a win at the top level v 1.d4 with the KID? Isn't Radjabov still trying it at least?)
(Btw, can't black still play for a win at the top level v 1.d4 with the KID? Isn't Radjabov still trying it at least?)
-
- Posts: 704
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 12:27 pm
Re: World Championship 2010
QGD Lasker. Anand wants a no-risk draw.
Re: World Championship 2010
A Nimzo is solid, yet would keep enough in the position to allow him to play if Topalov decides to go for it.
I suspect that the choice would have been either a Queens Indian or transposition back into a QGD as from memory Topolov doesn't allow the Nimzo.
I suspect that the choice would have been either a Queens Indian or transposition back into a QGD as from memory Topolov doesn't allow the Nimzo.
-
- Posts: 10384
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Re: World Championship 2010
No idea but it's not going to be the peaceful draw I was expecting a few moves ago.Mick Norris wrote:Is Anand winning now?
-
- Posts: 704
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 12:27 pm
Re: World Championship 2010
Anand to make his 37th. Things are heating up.LozCooper wrote:No idea but it's not going to be the peaceful draw I was expecting a few moves ago.Mick Norris wrote:Is Anand winning now?
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:35 pm
- Location: All Of Them
Re: World Championship 2010
What site are you lot watching it on?
Lose one queen and it is a disaster, Lose 1000 queens and it is just a statistic.
-
- Posts: 10384
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Re: World Championship 2010
Any postings on here represent my personal views
Re: World Championship 2010
Probably. One line my humble Crafty on Chessbase 7 likes is 39...Qg5 40 Rf8+ Kg7 41 Qf2 Re4 42 Rxa8+ Rxe3 43 Qg3 Qxg3+ 44 hg Rxa3 45 bxa3 c4 and a winning rook ending!Mick Norris wrote:Is Anand winning now?
Re: World Championship 2010
Anand now has a Queen against Topalov's Rook and Bishop. It looks to be significantly favourable for Anand.
-
- Posts: 4830
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:13 am
- Location: Bideford
Re: World Championship 2010
This would be very interesting, seeing as Topalov last had a bishop on move 17. Do you mean rook and knight?Igor M. Fulovich wrote:Anand now has a Queen against Topalov's Rook and Bishop. It looks to be significantly favourable for Anand.
-
- Posts: 704
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 12:27 pm
Re: World Championship 2010
R+N. It's a tough 'un for Topalov. Topalov just played 49.a4 -- I don't think he could move eith R or N.IM Jack Rudd wrote: This would be very interesting, seeing as Topalov last had a bishop on move 17. Do you mean rook and knight?
Last edited by Arshad Ali on Tue May 11, 2010 5:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.