Page 1 of 3

TV Programme

Posted: Fri Oct 22, 2010 9:15 pm
by Alex McFarlane
Child Genius is on on Thursday 28th October at 9pm (Channel 4)

This is the programme that shot the footage at this year's British Championships.

Might be interesting.

Re: TV Programme

Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2010 3:53 pm
by ThomasThorpe
Thanks for posting. I've been wondering when this would be broadcast :)

Re: TV Programme

Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 10:24 pm
by Carol Williams
From a chess aspect we wouldn’t get overexcited about this, the content is very poor mainly due to the focus of the programme being changed without us being informed. Andrew Martin was interviewed without our knowledge/consent some of his comments are being broadcast and others which were inaccurate have been taken out but will be addressed by us privately with the relevant bodies.

Re: TV Programme

Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 10:29 pm
by Carl Hibbard
Sounds contreversial?

Re: TV Programme

Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 10:54 pm
by Carol Williams
Having viewed the pre-release of the programme in Guernsey last week the posting is not controversial it is factual

Re: TV Programme

Posted: Wed Oct 27, 2010 7:23 am
by Carl Hibbard
Carol Williams wrote:Having viewed the pre-release of the programme in Guernsey last week the posting is not controversial it is factual
I meant the programme not your post....

Re: TV Programme

Posted: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:34 pm
by Carol Williams
Apologies Carl I misinterpreted your post :oops:

Re: TV Programme

Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:23 pm
by John Moore
"From a chess aspect we wouldn’t get overexcited about this, the content is very poor mainly due to the focus of the programme being changed without us being informed. Andrew Martin was interviewed without our knowledge/consent some of his comments are being broadcast and others which were inaccurate have been taken out but will be addressed by us privately with the relevant bodies."

Sorry but I don't understand this post at all. Why would Andrew need your knowledge/consent. Perhaps I have misunderstood.

Re: TV Programme

Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 10:04 pm
by Geoff Chandler
Alex.

What a load of old tosh.

Two kids whose childhood had been denied them so they can
end up doing 9-5 in some bland office,

Another on some kid who paints naff paintings and sells them
to chumps looking for an investment.
Honestly I've seen better scribbles on the toilet wall in Bells.

Some girl who can play the piano a bit and now wants to
be a film director.

The Chess bit lasted all of 5 minutes and I saw more of a tortoise
in a garden than I did of a chessboard.

This is the last time I listen to you.

Re: TV Programme

Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 10:23 pm
by Neill Cooper
Geoff Chandler wrote:Two kids whose childhood had been denied them so they can end up doing 9-5 in some bland office,
But they already have 2 excellent A levels (very few Upper sixth students do as well in further maths) so once they are teenagers and rebel they might decide to do something more constructive with their qualifications.
Geoff Chandler wrote:Another on some kid who paints naff paintings and sells them to chumps looking for an investment. Honestly I've seen better scribbles on the toilet wall in Bells.
They are better than I can do - so he has made a tidy sum which the parent's are looking after sensibly. After all most art is sold on hype anyway.
Geoff Chandler wrote:The Chess bit lasted all of 5 minutes and I saw more of a tortoise in a garden than I did of a chessboard.
I think there was a clear contrast between presented between Peter, whose only achievements are in chess, and some of the other teenagers who are broader and so getting exam results as well.

Re: TV Programme

Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 11:02 pm
by Carol Williams
Geoff Chandler wrote:Alex.

What a load of old tosh.

Two kids whose childhood had been denied them so they can
end up doing 9-5 in some bland office,

Another on some kid who paints naff paintings and sells them
to chumps looking for an investment.
Honestly I've seen better scribbles on the toilet wall in Bells.

Some girl who can play the piano a bit and now wants to
be a film director.

The Chess bit lasted all of 5 minutes and I saw more of a tortoise
in a garden than I did of a chessboard.

This is the last time I listen to you.

I did say don't get overexcited about the chess, although I do have to say that is a very good picture of one of our tortoises

Re: TV Programme

Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 11:14 pm
by Carol Williams
Neill Cooper wrote:
Geoff Chandler wrote:Two kids whose childhood had been denied them so they can end up doing 9-5 in some bland office,
But they already have 2 excellent A levels (very few Upper sixth students do as well in further maths) so once they are teenagers and rebel they might decide to do something more constructive with their qualifications.
Geoff Chandler wrote:Another on some kid who paints naff paintings and sells them to chumps looking for an investment. Honestly I've seen better scribbles on the toilet wall in Bells.
They are better than I can do - so he has made a tidy sum which the parent's are looking after sensibly. After all most art is sold on hype anyway.
Geoff Chandler wrote:The Chess bit lasted all of 5 minutes and I saw more of a tortoise in a garden than I did of a chessboard.
I think there was a clear contrast between presented between Peter, whose only achievements are in chess, and some of the other teenagers who are broader and so getting exam results as well.
Neil
I think there is a bit of grammatical error in your post but never mind we can't all be geniuses or genii. In the program there were no reports of any teenagers and exam results. Also please don't forget that there is a world of difference between what is filmed and what is broadcast - oh so much has been left on the cutting room floor!

Re: TV Programme

Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 11:20 pm
by Carol Williams
John Moore wrote:"From a chess aspect we wouldn’t get overexcited about this, the content is very poor mainly due to the focus of the programme being changed without us being informed. Andrew Martin was interviewed without our knowledge/consent some of his comments are being broadcast and others which were inaccurate have been taken out but will be addressed by us privately with the relevant bodies."

Sorry but I don't understand this post at all. Why would Andrew need your knowledge/consent. Perhaps I have misunderstood.
Because:-
a) the subject is a minor
b) the situation he is commenting on is at least 5 years out of date
c) he is obviously totally ignorant of home education and its aims and objectives
d) he knows us personally
e) its good manners
f) shall I continue?

Re: TV Programme

Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 11:50 pm
by Geoff Chandler
What is the name of the tortoise and more importantly, what is it's IQ?

Maybe the TV companies can do a programme about it and Alex can
make me waste another hour of my life by telling me to watch it.

(can the tortoise paint?).

Re: TV Programme

Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 11:51 pm
by Neill Cooper
Carol Williams wrote: In the program there were no reports of any teenagers and exam results.
I remember a 6A*, 5A being quoted for one. (And A levels by pre-teens).